H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Roberto Bautista Agut vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 3-2

Roberto Bautista Agut holds a 3–2 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Feliciano Lopez leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Roberto Bautista Agut leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Roberto Bautista Agut won the 2020 Australian Open first round 6-2 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberto Bautista Agut
Spain Age 38 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 22, 2020* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Roberto Bautista Agut #9 6-2 6-2 7-5 Feliciano Lopez #57 Match data
Apr 18, 2018* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Roberto Bautista Agut #16 6-3 7-6(5) Feliciano Lopez #30 Match data
May 4, 2016* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Roberto Bautista Agut #17 6-3 5-7 7-5 Feliciano Lopez #23 Match data
Mar 15, 2016* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Feliciano Lopez #21 7-6(5) 6-7(10) 6-4 Roberto Bautista Agut #17 Match data
Aug 6, 2014* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Feliciano Lopez #25 7-6(7) 6-3 Roberto Bautista Agut #16 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roberto Bautista Agut #180 #9 3,215 2,106 411 294 58.3% 0 0 0 1 11 12
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,013 497 477 51.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberto Bautista Agut Feliciano Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,699 0 0
21 2009 0–1 0.0% #281 1,553 0 0 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,841 0 0
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #170 1,512 0 0 2004 30–24 55.6% #25 1,833 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1
24 2012 3–10 23.1% #80 1,661 0 0 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,676 0 1
25 2013 25–21 54.3% #58 1,800 0 0 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,804 0 1
26 2014 44–21 67.7% #15 2,005 0 2 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,829 0 1
27 2015 41–29 58.6% #25 1,997 0 2 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,724 0 1
28 2016 46–22 67.6% #14 1,991 0 4 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,807 0 2
29 2017 46–22 67.6% #20 1,999 0 6 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2
30 2018 33–18 64.7% #24 1,932 0 8 2012 24–26 48.0% #40 1,844 0 2
31 2019 40–22 64.5% #9 1,940 0 9 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3
32 2020 14–8 63.6% #13 1,960 0 9 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,950 0 4
33 2021 29–23 55.8% #19 1,849 0 9 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,943 0 4
34 2022 31–19 62.0% #21 1,870 0 11 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,890 0 5
35 2023 17–21 44.7% #57 1,745 0 11 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,900 0 6
36 2024 23–21 52.3% #51 1,812 0 12 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,817 0 6
37 2025 15–22 40.5% #90 1,771 0 12 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,824 0 7
38 2026 4–13 23.5% #180 1,631 0 12 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,763 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,595 0 7
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7
41 — — — — — — — 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7