H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Roberto Bautista Agut vs Ivo Karlovic H2H: 1-1
Roberto Bautista Agut and Ivo Karlovic are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Roberto Bautista Agut won the 2018 Barcelona third round 6-7(4) 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
211 cm / 6'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2018* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Roberto Bautista Agut | 6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 | Ivo Karlovic | Match data |
| May 9, 2017* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Ivo Karlovic | 7-6(4) 6-7(9) 7-6(7) | Roberto Bautista Agut | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberto Bautista Agut | #180 | #9 | 3,215 | 2,106 | 411 | 294 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 12 |
| Ivo Karlovic | #1,066 | #14 | 2,295 | 1,998 | 357 | 333 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roberto Bautista Agut | Ivo Karlovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #281 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #73 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #58 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #61 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 2,005 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #70 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 41–29 | 58.6% | #25 | 1,997 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #98 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,991 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #22 | 1,940 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2017 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,999 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #26 | 1,815 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2018 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,932 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,795 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #9 | 1,940 | 0 | 9 | 2010 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #73 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2020 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,960 | 0 | 9 | 2011 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #56 | 1,819 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2021 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 9 | 2012 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #100 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #21 | 1,870 | 0 | 11 | 2013 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #78 | 1,772 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2023 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | 2014 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #27 | 1,853 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | 2024 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #51 | 1,812 | 0 | 12 | 2015 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #23 | 1,916 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | 2025 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #90 | 1,771 | 0 | 12 | 2016 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #20 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | 2026 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #180 | 1,631 | 0 | 12 | 2017 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #100 | 1,644 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #95 | 1,668 | 0 | 8 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #147 | 1,615 | 0 | 8 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,623 | 0 | 8 |