H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Roberto Bautista Agut vs John Isner H2H: 2-4

John Isner holds a 4–2 lead over Roberto Bautista Agut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, John Isner leads 3–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, John Isner won the 2021 Madrid Masters third round 6-4 6-7(4) 7-6(6).

Spain Age 38 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 4
6 main draw meetings
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 5, 2021* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay John Isner #39 6-4 6-7(4) 7-6(6) Roberto Bautista Agut #11 Match data
Mar 31, 2021* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Roberto Bautista Agut #12 6-3 4-6 7-6(7) John Isner #28 Match data
Mar 29, 2019* Miami Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard John Isner #9 7-6(1) 7-6(5) Roberto Bautista Agut #25 Match data
Jan 16, 2016* Auckland ATP 250 QF Hard Roberto Bautista Agut #25 7-5 2-6 6-3 John Isner #11 Match data
Jan 11, 2014* Auckland ATP 250 SF Hard John Isner #14 3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 Roberto Bautista Agut #73 Match data
Oct 4, 2013* Beijing ATP 500 R16 Hard John Isner #16 6-2 6-7(3) 6-4 Roberto Bautista Agut #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roberto Bautista Agut #180 #9 3,215 2,106 411 294 58.3% 0 0 0 1 11 12
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,053 467 293 61.4% 0 1 0 0 15 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberto Bautista Agut John Isner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 2009 0–1 0.0% #281 1,553 0 0
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #170 1,512 0 0 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0
23 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,608 0 0
24 2012 3–10 23.1% #80 1,661 0 0 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,828 0 0
25 2013 25–21 54.3% #58 1,800 0 0 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,882 0 1
26 2014 44–21 67.7% #15 2,005 0 2 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,021 0 3
27 2015 41–29 58.6% #25 1,997 0 2 2012 38–18 67.9% #14 1,965 0 5
28 2016 46–22 67.6% #14 1,991 0 4 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,983 0 7
29 2017 46–22 67.6% #20 1,999 0 6 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,922 0 9
30 2018 33–18 64.7% #24 1,932 0 8 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,026 0 10
31 2019 40–22 64.5% #9 1,940 0 9 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,019 0 10
32 2020 14–8 63.6% #13 1,960 0 9 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,984 0 12
33 2021 29–23 55.8% #19 1,849 0 9 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,956 0 14
34 2022 31–19 62.0% #21 1,870 0 11 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,921 0 15
35 2023 17–21 44.7% #57 1,745 0 11 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15
36 2024 23–21 52.3% #51 1,812 0 12 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,933 0 16
37 2025 15–22 40.5% #90 1,771 0 12 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,891 0 16
38 2026 4–13 23.5% #180 1,631 0 12 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,698 0 16