H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Roberto Bautista Agut vs Kei Nishikori H2H: 1-4

Kei Nishikori holds a 4–1 lead over Roberto Bautista Agut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Kei Nishikori leads 3–0 on clay, while Roberto Bautista Agut leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Roberto Bautista Agut won the 2017 Wimbledon third round 6-4 7-6(3) 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberto Bautista Agut
Spain Age 38 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Kei Nishikori
Japan Age 36 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 9, 2017* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Roberto Bautista Agut #19 6-4 7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 Kei Nishikori #9 Match data
Mar 30, 2016* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Kei Nishikori #6 6-2 6-4 Roberto Bautista Agut #18 Match data
May 8, 2015* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Kei Nishikori #5 6-3 6-3 Roberto Bautista Agut #16 Match data
Apr 25, 2015* Barcelona ATP 500 QF Clay Kei Nishikori #5 6-2 3-6 6-1 Roberto Bautista Agut #16 Match data
Apr 24, 2014* Barcelona ATP 500 R32 Clay Kei Nishikori #17 6-1 4-6 6-3 Roberto Bautista Agut #45 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roberto Bautista Agut #180 #9 3,215 2,106 411 294 58.3% 0 0 0 1 11 12
Kei Nishikori #464 #4 6,385 2,245 424 226 65.2% 0 0 0 5 7 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberto Bautista Agut Kei Nishikori
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2007 3–5 37.5% #286 1,576 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 16–10 61.5% #63 1,792 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 2009 3–6 33.3% #418 1,743 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 2010 3–9 25.0% #98 1,743 0 1
21 2009 0–1 0.0% #281 1,553 0 0 2011 32–22 59.3% #25 1,922 0 1
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #170 1,512 0 0 2012 32–17 65.3% #19 1,971 0 2
23 — — — — — — — 2013 34–19 64.2% #17 1,940 0 3
24 2012 3–10 23.1% #80 1,661 0 0 2014 52–15 77.6% #5 2,211 0 7
25 2013 25–21 54.3% #58 1,800 0 0 2015 51–17 75.0% #8 2,131 0 10
26 2014 44–21 67.7% #15 2,005 0 2 2016 52–20 72.2% #5 2,151 0 11
27 2015 41–29 58.6% #25 1,997 0 2 2017 30–14 68.2% #22 2,067 0 11
28 2016 46–22 67.6% #14 1,991 0 4 2018 43–21 67.2% #9 2,105 0 11
29 2017 46–22 67.6% #20 1,999 0 6 2019 29–14 67.4% #13 2,001 0 12
30 2018 33–18 64.7% #24 1,932 0 8 2020 2–4 33.3% #41 1,911 0 12
31 2019 40–22 64.5% #9 1,940 0 9 2021 24–15 61.5% #47 1,945 0 12
32 2020 14–8 63.6% #13 1,960 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 2021 29–23 55.8% #19 1,849 0 9 2023 2–1 66.7% #352 1,938 0 12
34 2022 31–19 62.0% #21 1,870 0 11 2024 7–8 46.7% #106 1,863 0 12
35 2023 17–21 44.7% #57 1,745 0 11 2025 9–9 50.0% #156 1,809 0 12
36 2024 23–21 52.3% #51 1,812 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2025 15–22 40.5% #90 1,771 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2026 4–13 23.5% #180 1,631 0 12 — — — — — — —