H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Roberto Bautista Agut vs Marco Cecchinato H2H: 2-1
Roberto Bautista Agut holds a 2–1 lead over Marco Cecchinato in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Roberto Bautista Agut leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marco Cecchinato won the 2023 Rome Masters second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Italy
Age 33
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2023* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Marco Cecchinato | 6-2 6-2 | Roberto Bautista Agut | Match data |
| May 4, 2021* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Roberto Bautista Agut | 6-2 6-7(3) 7-5 | Marco Cecchinato | Match data |
| Sep 22, 2018* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Roberto Bautista Agut | 7-6(0) 6-3 | Marco Cecchinato | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberto Bautista Agut | #180 | #9 | 3,215 | 2,106 | 411 | 294 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 12 |
| Marco Cecchinato | #175 | #16 | 2,091 | 1,903 | 79 | 128 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roberto Bautista Agut | Marco Cecchinato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #281 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #187 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #58 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #20 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2014 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 2,005 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2015 | 41–29 | 58.6% | #25 | 1,997 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #80 | 1,764 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2016 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,991 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #100 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2017 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,999 | 0 | 6 | 2022 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #101 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2018 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,932 | 0 | 8 | 2023 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #198 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #9 | 1,940 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,960 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 9 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,544 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #21 | 1,870 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #51 | 1,812 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #90 | 1,771 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #180 | 1,631 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |