H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Roberto Bautista Agut vs Nicolas Mahut H2H: 1-2
Nicolas Mahut holds a 2–1 lead over Roberto Bautista Agut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Nicolas Mahut leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Mahut won the 2016 Cincinnati Masters second round 7-6(2) 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2016* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Nicolas Mahut | 7-6(2) 2-6 6-3 | Roberto Bautista Agut | Match data |
| Jun 12, 2015* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Nicolas Mahut | 6-2 6-4 | Roberto Bautista Agut | Match data |
| Jun 20, 2014* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Roberto Bautista Agut | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Nicolas Mahut | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberto Bautista Agut | #180 | #9 | 3,215 | 2,106 | 411 | 294 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 12 |
| Nicolas Mahut | #1,433 | #37 | 1,122 | 1,926 | 179 | 224 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roberto Bautista Agut | Nicolas Mahut | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #281 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #94 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #58 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 2,005 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 41–29 | 58.6% | #25 | 1,997 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,991 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #132 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,999 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,932 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #108 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #9 | 1,940 | 0 | 9 | 2013 | 17–7 | 70.8% | #50 | 1,851 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2020 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,960 | 0 | 9 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #117 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2021 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 9 | 2015 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #71 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #21 | 1,870 | 0 | 11 | 2016 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 2023 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #103 | 1,753 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | 2024 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #51 | 1,812 | 0 | 12 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #190 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 37 | 2025 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #90 | 1,771 | 0 | 12 | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #194 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 38 | 2026 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #180 | 1,631 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |