H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Roberto Bautista Agut vs Paolo Lorenzi H2H: 2-0
Roberto Bautista Agut holds a 2–0 lead over Paolo Lorenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Roberto Bautista Agut leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Roberto Bautista Agut won the 2016 Rome Masters second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2016* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Roberto Bautista Agut | 6-3 6-1 | Paolo Lorenzi | Match data |
| May 28, 2014* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Roberto Bautista Agut | 6-3 7-5 6-2 | Paolo Lorenzi | Match data |
| Mar 22, 2012* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Roberto Bautista Agut | 5-7 6-4 7-5 | Paolo Lorenzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberto Bautista Agut | #180 | #9 | 3,215 | 2,106 | 411 | 294 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 12 |
| Paolo Lorenzi | #1,033 | #33 | 1,223 | 1,823 | 104 | 180 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roberto Bautista Agut | Paolo Lorenzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #281 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2012 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #58 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #294 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 2,005 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 41–29 | 58.6% | #25 | 1,997 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #84 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,991 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #143 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,999 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,932 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #9 | 1,940 | 0 | 9 | 2013 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #109 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2020 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,960 | 0 | 9 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2021 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 9 | 2015 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #21 | 1,870 | 0 | 11 | 2016 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 2023 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | 2017 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | 2024 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #51 | 1,812 | 0 | 12 | 2018 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | 2025 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #90 | 1,771 | 0 | 12 | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | 2026 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #180 | 1,631 | 0 | 12 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #146 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 |