H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Roberto Bautista Agut vs Philipp Kohlschreiber H2H: 3-2

Roberto Bautista Agut holds a 3–2 lead over Philipp Kohlschreiber in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Philipp Kohlschreiber leads 2–1 on clay, while Roberto Bautista Agut leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberto Bautista Agut won the 2022 Australian Open second round 6-1 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberto Bautista Agut
Spain Age 38 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Philipp Kohlschreiber
GER Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 20, 2022* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Roberto Bautista Agut #18 6-1 6-0 6-3 Philipp Kohlschreiber #134 Match data
May 9, 2018* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Philipp Kohlschreiber #28 6-3 4-6 7-5 Roberto Bautista Agut #14 Match data
May 5, 2018* Munich ATP 250 QF Clay Philipp Kohlschreiber #34 6-4 6-4 Roberto Bautista Agut #14 Match data
Oct 24, 2015* Moscow ATP 250 SF Hard Roberto Bautista Agut #27 6-4 6-4 Philipp Kohlschreiber #34 Match data
Apr 15, 2015* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Roberto Bautista Agut #16 6-7(3) 6-3 7-6(4) Philipp Kohlschreiber #25 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roberto Bautista Agut #180 #9 3,215 2,106 411 294 58.3% 0 0 0 1 11 12
Philipp Kohlschreiber #779 #16 2,160 2,054 444 372 54.4% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberto Bautista Agut Philipp Kohlschreiber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2002 0–2 0.0% #247 1,493 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2003 1–3 25.0% #208 1,541 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2004 6–10 37.5% #88 1,562 0 0
21 2009 0–1 0.0% #281 1,553 0 0 2005 12–25 32.4% #86 1,538 0 0
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #170 1,512 0 0 2006 23–20 53.5% #62 1,653 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2007 30–23 56.6% #32 1,767 0 1
24 2012 3–10 23.1% #80 1,661 0 0 2008 29–19 60.4% #28 1,857 0 2
25 2013 25–21 54.3% #58 1,800 0 0 2009 34–26 56.7% #27 1,833 0 2
26 2014 44–21 67.7% #15 2,005 0 2 2010 34–24 58.6% #34 1,851 0 2
27 2015 41–29 58.6% #25 1,997 0 2 2011 28–22 56.0% #43 1,848 0 3
28 2016 46–22 67.6% #14 1,991 0 4 2012 40–24 62.5% #20 1,888 0 4
29 2017 46–22 67.6% #20 1,999 0 6 2013 33–24 57.9% #22 1,937 0 4
30 2018 33–18 64.7% #24 1,932 0 8 2014 32–25 56.1% #24 1,899 0 4
31 2019 40–22 64.5% #9 1,940 0 9 2015 30–22 57.7% #34 1,972 0 5
32 2020 14–8 63.6% #13 1,960 0 9 2016 29–22 56.9% #32 1,874 0 6
33 2021 29–23 55.8% #19 1,849 0 9 2017 32–20 61.5% #29 1,957 0 7
34 2022 31–19 62.0% #21 1,870 0 11 2018 24–22 52.2% #34 1,886 0 7
35 2023 17–21 44.7% #57 1,745 0 11 2019 17–21 44.7% #79 1,787 0 7
36 2024 23–21 52.3% #51 1,812 0 12 2020 2–7 22.2% #98 1,725 0 7
37 2025 15–22 40.5% #90 1,771 0 12 2021 7–8 46.7% #114 1,717 0 7
38 2026 4–13 23.5% #180 1,631 0 12 2022 1–3 25.0% #416 1,662 0 7