H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Roberto Bautista Agut vs Simone Bolelli H2H: 1-0

Roberto Bautista Agut holds a 1–0 lead over Simone Bolelli in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Roberto Bautista Agut leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberto Bautista Agut won the 2016 Dubai Tennis Championships first round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberto Bautista Agut
Spain Age 38 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Simone Bolelli
ITA Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Roberto Bautista Agut #18 6-2 6-4 Simone Bolelli #73 Match data Feb 24, 2016* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Roberto Bautista Agut #232 #9 3,215 2,104 415 296 58.4% 0 0 0 1 11 12
Simone Bolelli #1,391 #36 1,686 1,931 113 157 41.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberto Bautista Agut Simone Bolelli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 2006 0–4 0.0% #127 1,465 0 0
21 2009 0–1 0.0% #281 1,552 0 0 2007 8–14 36.4% #67 1,601 0 0
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #170 1,512 0 0 2008 26–28 48.1% #41 1,775 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2009 14–22 38.9% #93 1,698 0 0
24 2012 3–10 23.1% #80 1,658 0 0 2010 5–11 31.2% #107 1,672 0 0
25 2013 26–22 54.2% #58 1,801 0 0 2011 4–8 33.3% #134 1,679 0 0
26 2014 44–21 67.7% #15 2,029 0 2 2012 6–10 37.5% #84 1,713 0 0
27 2015 41–29 58.6% #25 1,997 0 2 2013 6–8 42.9% #245 1,693 0 0
28 2016 49–23 68.1% #14 1,992 0 4 2014 6–8 42.9% #55 1,744 0 0
29 2017 46–22 67.6% #20 2,003 0 6 2015 28–25 52.8% #58 1,874 0 0
30 2018 33–18 64.7% #24 1,934 0 8 2016 2–8 20.0% #464 1,791 0 0
31 2019 40–22 64.5% #9 1,945 0 9 2017 2–4 33.3% #171 1,801 0 0
32 2020 14–8 63.6% #13 1,962 0 9 2018 5–4 55.6% #141 1,788 0 0
33 2021 29–23 55.8% #19 1,845 0 9 2019 1–3 25.0% #334 1,736 0 0
34 2022 31–19 62.0% #21 1,878 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 2023 17–21 44.7% #57 1,747 0 11 — — — — — — —
36 2024 23–21 52.3% #51 1,813 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2025 15–22 40.5% #90 1,771 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2026 4–13 23.5% #232 1,631 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Roberto Bautista Agut Simone Bolelli
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 3 6 9 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 12 18 30 40.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 6 13 19 31.6% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2012 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 5 5 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — —
25 2013 15 13 28 53.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2014 25 15 40 62.5% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 1 8 87.5% — — — — 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2015 25 17 42 59.5% 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2016 37 16 53 69.8% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2014 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2017 30 13 43 69.8% 11 7 18 61.1% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2015 16 15 31 51.6% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
30 2018 19 11 30 63.3% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2016 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
31 2019 25 13 38 65.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2020 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2018 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 2021 18 13 31 58.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2022 19 13 32 59.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 10 12 22 45.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 12 13 25 48.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 4 10 14 28.6% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 3 6 9 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 255 181 436 58.5% 103 85 188 54.8% 57 30 87 65.5% — — — — — 46 80 126 36.5% 50 59 109 45.9% 16 16 32 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 698/711 of Roberto Bautista Agut's and 266/270 of Simone Bolelli's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Roberto Bautista Agut Simone Bolelli
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 4/4 4.0 0.8 61.9% 62.3% 51.2% 60.8% 21.9% 58.5% 33.3%
21 2009 1/1 0.0 1.0 58.3% 65.3% 45.7% 44.4% 50.0% 57.1% 37.5% 2007 22/22 4.5 1.1 65.5% 68.7% 52.3% 48.4% 46.5% 63.0% 29.8%
22 2010 1/1 0.0 1.0 64.5% 57.1% 55.6% 62.5% 0.0% 56.6% 34.7% 2008 53/54 5.0 1.4 66.9% 70.0% 54.6% 67.0% 39.3% 64.9% 33.3%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 35/36 4.7 1.4 62.8% 69.0% 52.1% 63.8% 34.1% 62.8% 33.4%
24 2012 13/13 2.5 2.8 60.9% 65.2% 44.8% 55.4% 37.6% 57.1% 38.8% 2010 16/16 3.4 1.5 67.1% 66.4% 44.3% 48.6% 45.6% 59.2% 34.1%
25 2013 48/48 2.2 1.7 70.5% 65.0% 53.7% 58.9% 47.9% 61.7% 40.2% 2011 12/12 3.1 0.4 69.6% 62.8% 52.8% 55.1% 51.6% 59.7% 32.4%
26 2014 64/65 2.7 2.0 69.2% 70.0% 53.4% 63.0% 46.8% 64.8% 39.9% 2012 16/16 2.9 2.0 64.9% 69.4% 46.3% 52.2% 50.5% 61.5% 33.7%
27 2015 70/70 3.7 1.9 64.3% 72.5% 56.4% 65.4% 44.7% 66.7% 37.8% 2013 14/14 3.6 1.7 63.1% 66.1% 51.9% 38.0% 43.4% 61.0% 33.4%
28 2016 65/72 3.5 2.2 65.4% 69.7% 53.2% 58.5% 42.5% 64.1% 40.0% 2014 14/14 5.7 2.6 64.7% 70.3% 59.7% 44.0% 31.9% 66.1% 33.2%
29 2017 67/68 2.9 2.2 63.1% 71.4% 55.6% 57.2% 45.1% 65.5% 42.0% 2015 52/53 4.2 1.6 66.7% 72.3% 56.2% 63.8% 47.2% 66.8% 35.1%
30 2018 51/51 3.2 2.0 63.6% 71.6% 54.1% 64.0% 46.4% 65.4% 39.4% 2016 9/10 5.9 1.7 65.1% 66.8% 49.0% 60.6% 44.0% 60.3% 28.9%
31 2019 61/62 3.9 1.7 65.7% 73.0% 56.5% 61.9% 43.0% 67.4% 39.0% 2017 6/6 2.5 1.0 73.1% 61.7% 58.7% 62.5% 45.4% 60.9% 33.2%
32 2020 22/22 3.6 2.3 66.8% 67.1% 55.5% 59.9% 43.5% 63.2% 42.3% 2018 9/9 2.0 1.1 76.5% 65.6% 52.5% 65.5% 35.4% 62.1% 37.9%
33 2021 51/52 3.3 1.7 65.3% 70.8% 55.0% 58.0% 47.3% 65.1% 40.5% 2019 4/4 1.8 1.0 68.3% 62.6% 53.1% 50.6% 66.7% 59.4% 28.4%
34 2022 48/50 2.9 1.7 66.1% 71.2% 54.3% 60.5% 42.5% 65.4% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 38/38 3.9 1.8 65.7% 70.2% 56.1% 48.4% 39.3% 65.2% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 44/44 2.7 2.0 68.2% 68.5% 53.6% 61.0% 46.3% 63.7% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 37/37 2.7 2.1 66.2% 67.9% 49.2% 54.3% 41.2% 61.7% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 17/17 3.3 1.5 68.3% 63.4% 49.5% 55.5% 21.5% 59.1% 29.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 698/711 3.2 2.0 66.0% 70.0% 54.2% 59.6% 43.8% 64.5% 39.1% — 266/270 4.2 1.5 66.3% 68.8% 53.1% 58.4% 42.5% 63.4% 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Roberto Bautista Agut Simone Bolelli
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2007 1516 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1496 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1520 105.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1465 108.7 -0.66 -0.84 0.803 46.1% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.29
21 2009 1552 103.5 +1.07 -0.83 0.875 47.6% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — 0.00 2007 1602 127.2 +0.03 -4.56 0.806 47.1% -42 -20 — 34.6% -0.88 1–1 4–6 (40%) — -1.31
22 2010 1512 104.6 +2.71 -1.02 0.798 45.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — 0.00 2008 1775 145.8 +2.16 -1.96 0.948 49.3% -80 -27 -102 49.6% -0.16 3–9 (25%) 17–16 (52%) — -1.86
23 2011 1527 111.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1699 138.5 +0.14 -1.79 0.899 48.4% -66 +76 — 42.2% -0.63 5–6 (45%) 8–10 (44%) — -2.05
24 2012 1658 125.8 -3.50 +0.03 0.904 47.8% +40 — — 24.1% -1.07 1–1 0–2 — +0.77 2010 1673 123.9 -1.48 -2.28 0.836 46.4% -130 +148 — 33.3% -1.12 0–3 (0%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.61
25 2013 1801 149.4 -1.14 +2.56 1.049 50.8% -5 -134 -122 55.2% +0.16 9–7 (56%) 16–4 (80%) — +0.31 2011 1679 123.8 -1.26 -2.49 0.805 46.3% -108 +81 +96 36.7% -0.93 — 4–4 (50%) — -0.44
26 2014 2030 165.9 +1.17 +3.88 1.135 52.4% -48 -120 -136 63.1% +0.79 16–6 (73%) 12–7 (63%) — +0.17 2012 1713 127.3 -0.23 -1.02 0.877 47.7% -107 +38 +114 37.8% -1.03 1–1 5–2 (71%) — -0.65
27 2015 1997 164.8 +2.59 +2.45 1.136 52.3% +5 -85 -72 58.5% +0.74 8–11 (42%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.10 2013 1693 126.1 -1.20 -2.42 0.855 46.8% -60 +25 — 43.3% -0.77 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.13
28 2016 1993 166.6 +0.70 +3.83 1.115 52.0% +18 -28 -84 60.2% +0.64 16–10 (62%) 18–13 (58%) — +1.33 2014 1744 131.5 +2.15 -1.19 0.981 49.0% -78 +17 +83 45.7% -0.52 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.20
29 2017 2004 165.0 +2.13 +5.30 1.216 53.4% +17 -43 -69 64.5% +0.96 9–9 (50%) 18–15 (55%) — +1.62 2015 1874 157.5 +2.49 -0.19 1.057 50.9% -60 0 -28 53.5% +0.16 8–8 (50%) 13–13 (50%) — -3.63
30 2018 1934 153.9 +1.51 +3.16 1.139 52.4% +2 +33 +16 58.9% +0.65 13–4 (76%) 10–15 (40%) — +1.35 2016 1792 125.5 -1.80 -4.48 0.729 46.0% -65 — — 29.2% -1.54 0–1 4–2 (67%) — -0.64
31 2019 1945 168.2 +2.85 +3.28 1.198 52.6% +17 -23 +127 62.6% +0.84 13–10 (57%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.44 2017 1802 128.3 -0.83 -0.46 0.850 48.0% — — — 38.9% -0.72 0–1 0–2 — -0.45
32 2020 1963 158.1 +0.25 +4.32 1.148 52.4% +5 -47 — 61.8% +0.84 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.99 2018 1788 126.3 +1.16 +0.59 1.003 50.3% — +93 — 50.0% -0.04 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.61
33 2021 1845 157.0 +1.63 +3.89 1.161 52.3% +59 +10 +180 55.6% +0.44 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.34 2019 1737 109.6 -1.97 -2.79 0.700 44.5% -17 — — 22.2% -1.55 — 0–1 — +0.08
34 2022 1879 155.5 +1.66 +3.64 1.172 52.8% +3 -22 +178 60.7% +0.92 5–8 (38%) 10–11 (48%) — +1.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1747 145.2 +1.16 +0.69 1.049 50.3% +31 +36 +265 47.1% +0.03 8–8 (50%) 12–12 (50%) — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1814 141.9 -0.50 +1.21 1.022 50.6% -33 -28 +201 51.8% +0.04 6–7 (46%) 11–5 (69%) — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1771 133.9 -1.44 +0.34 0.951 49.2% -82 -25 +183 39.6% -0.44 7–4 (64%) 6–11 (35%) — -1.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1632 116.3 -4.22 -3.06 0.711 44.4% +42 +10 — 27.5% -1.57 2–2 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2104 160.3 +0.95 +2.89 1.104 51.7% +5 -39 +70 56.5% +0.48 125–104 (55%) 151–142 (52%) 99.9 +0.42 — 1932 141.2 +0.75 -1.74 0.911 48.5% -70 +37 +10 43.7% -0.51 26–37 (41%) 71–68 (51%) 98.2 -4.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.