H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Roberto Bautista Agut vs Tomas Berdych H2H: 3-4

Tomas Berdych holds a 4–3 lead over Roberto Bautista Agut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Roberto Bautista Agut leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Tomas Berdych leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Roberto Bautista Agut won the 2019 Doha final 6-4 3-6 6-3.

Spain Age 38 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 4
7 main draw meetings
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 5, 2019* Doha ATP 250 F Hard Roberto Bautista Agut #24 6-4 3-6 6-3 Tomas Berdych #71 Match data
Jan 26, 2016* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #6 4-6 6-4 6-3 1-6 6-3 Roberto Bautista Agut #21 Match data
Apr 17, 2015* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Tomas Berdych #8 7-6(7) 6-4 Roberto Bautista Agut #16 Match data
Jun 1, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Tomas Berdych #6 6-1 6-2 6-7(4) 6-4 Roberto Bautista Agut #90 Match data
Mar 9, 2014* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Roberto Bautista Agut #53 4-6 6-2 6-4 Tomas Berdych #5 Match data
Sep 27, 2013* Bangkok ATP 250 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #6 6-3 6-3 Roberto Bautista Agut #63 Match data
Jan 5, 2013* Chennai ATP 250 QF Hard Roberto Bautista Agut #80 7-5 2-6 6-3 Tomas Berdych #6 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roberto Bautista Agut #180 #9 3,215 2,106 411 294 58.3% 0 0 0 1 11 12
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberto Bautista Agut Tomas Berdych
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2
21 2009 0–1 0.0% #281 1,553 0 0 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #170 1,512 0 0 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5
24 2012 3–10 23.1% #80 1,661 0 0 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5
25 2013 25–21 54.3% #58 1,800 0 0 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6
26 2014 44–21 67.7% #15 2,005 0 2 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8
27 2015 41–29 58.6% #25 1,997 0 2 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8
28 2016 46–22 67.6% #14 1,991 0 4 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10
29 2017 46–22 67.6% #20 1,999 0 6 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12
30 2018 33–18 64.7% #24 1,932 0 8 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13
31 2019 40–22 64.5% #9 1,940 0 9 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13
32 2020 14–8 63.6% #13 1,960 0 9 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13
33 2021 29–23 55.8% #19 1,849 0 9 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13
34 2022 31–19 62.0% #21 1,870 0 11
35 2023 17–21 44.7% #57 1,745 0 11
36 2024 23–21 52.3% #51 1,812 0 12
37 2025 15–22 40.5% #90 1,771 0 12
38 2026 4–13 23.5% #180 1,631 0 12