H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Roberto Carballes Baena vs Aljaz Bedene H2H: 0-1

Aljaz Bedene holds a 1–0 lead over Roberto Carballes Baena in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aljaz Bedene leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aljaz Bedene won the 2016 Miami Open first round 4-6 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberto Carballes Baena
Spain Age 33 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Aljaz Bedene
SLO Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Aljaz Bedene #92 7-6(5) 3-6 6-1 Roberto Carballes Baena #72 Match data Jun 17, 2019 Q2 Q Queen's Club Championships ATP 500 Grass
Aljaz Bedene #57 4-6 6-2 6-3 Roberto Carballes Baena #114 Match data Mar 25, 2016* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Roberto Carballes Baena #209 #49 1,071 1,797 129 166 43.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Aljaz Bedene #1,030 #43 1,169 1,893 131 160 45.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberto Carballes Baena Aljaz Bedene
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2013 0–1 0.0% #267 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2014 3–3 50.0% #167 1,553 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #165 1,598 0 0
22 2015 1–2 33.3% #131 1,603 0 0 2012 3–4 42.9% #86 1,627 0 0
23 2016 6–9 40.0% #145 1,662 0 0 2013 11–18 37.9% #95 1,631 0 0
24 2017 3–2 60.0% #106 1,590 0 0 2014 5–9 35.7% #145 1,671 0 0
25 2018 14–17 45.2% #73 1,659 0 1 2015 17–17 50.0% #45 1,777 0 0
26 2019 19–20 48.7% #80 1,714 0 1 2016 12–19 38.7% #101 1,740 0 0
27 2020 6–8 42.9% #97 1,678 0 1 2017 19–18 51.4% #49 1,816 0 0
28 2021 11–17 39.3% #79 1,729 0 1 2018 17–19 47.2% #67 1,733 0 0
29 2022 11–18 37.9% #74 1,725 0 1 2019 18–18 50.0% #58 1,844 0 0
30 2023 19–24 44.2% #63 1,689 0 2 2020 10–12 45.5% #58 1,798 0 0
31 2024 25–26 49.0% #57 1,733 0 2 2021 15–15 50.0% #109 1,773 0 0
32 2025 11–18 37.9% #129 1,656 0 2 2022 3–10 23.1% #347 1,660 0 0
33 2026 0–1 0.0% #209 1,574 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Roberto Carballes Baena Aljaz Bedene
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2013 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2015 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 2 1 3 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2017 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2014 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2018 3 3 6 50.0% 11 12 23 47.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2015 10 10 20 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2019 5 8 13 38.5% 13 9 22 59.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2016 6 8 14 42.9% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 2017 6 10 16 37.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
28 2021 3 5 8 37.5% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 2018 2 7 9 22.2% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 2022 4 8 12 33.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 8 7 15 53.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2023 3 9 12 25.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2020 8 11 19 42.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
31 2024 10 12 22 45.5% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2021 6 5 11 54.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 2025 7 10 17 41.2% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2022 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 36 60 96 37.5% 89 92 181 49.2% 4 14 18 22.2% — 57 74 131 43.5% 61 64 125 48.8% 13 22 35 37.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 293/295 of Roberto Carballes Baena's and 290/291 of Aljaz Bedene's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Roberto Carballes Baena Aljaz Bedene
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2013 1/1 3.0 4.0 51.9% 53.6% 30.8% 50.0% 42.9% 42.6% 45.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 6/6 1.7 3.5 59.7% 60.4% 49.1% 55.9% 58.2% 55.9% 42.6% 2011 2/2 9.0 2.5 60.2% 81.9% 49.2% 42.9% 33.3% 69.0% 28.3%
22 2015 3/3 2.7 2.7 61.8% 62.4% 45.1% 62.0% 69.5% 56.0% 35.3% 2012 7/7 5.6 3.6 56.4% 71.7% 41.5% 62.9% 49.7% 57.7% 34.3%
23 2016 15/15 4.1 2.6 61.8% 70.2% 51.5% 54.9% 40.0% 62.6% 36.4% 2013 29/29 7.9 3.7 57.4% 72.6% 50.5% 49.4% 43.5% 62.9% 36.7%
24 2017 5/5 5.0 4.4 57.7% 75.9% 60.4% 74.4% 44.8% 69.4% 41.5% 2014 14/14 8.8 3.1 53.1% 71.5% 45.5% 45.9% 48.1% 59.5% 33.9%
25 2018 31/31 2.4 3.6 62.6% 70.9% 49.2% 58.2% 41.2% 62.8% 36.4% 2015 34/34 8.1 2.9 54.0% 76.1% 48.8% 58.9% 43.1% 63.5% 35.6%
26 2019 39/39 3.3 3.3 62.1% 67.0% 50.2% 57.5% 48.7% 60.6% 39.2% 2016 31/31 9.1 2.9 57.4% 73.7% 49.6% 55.2% 42.1% 63.3% 35.5%
27 2020 14/14 1.9 2.4 65.9% 60.7% 49.8% 53.0% 37.6% 56.1% 36.9% 2017 37/37 7.9 2.0 59.3% 73.4% 52.1% 55.4% 40.6% 64.8% 36.3%
28 2021 26/28 2.4 2.7 64.4% 63.2% 48.8% 49.9% 40.3% 58.0% 39.6% 2018 36/36 8.1 2.2 57.6% 72.3% 49.3% 59.6% 32.0% 62.3% 37.5%
29 2022 29/29 1.9 2.9 61.6% 66.3% 52.2% 59.4% 61.7% 60.7% 35.2% 2019 35/36 9.4 3.2 57.1% 74.2% 49.1% 59.0% 45.0% 63.9% 35.1%
30 2023 43/43 2.4 2.4 62.5% 69.0% 51.8% 53.2% 45.5% 62.4% 38.1% 2020 22/22 9.4 3.7 56.7% 77.7% 45.9% 56.2% 31.1% 64.3% 30.5%
31 2024 51/51 2.8 2.1 65.3% 67.8% 52.0% 55.7% 38.2% 62.2% 37.5% 2021 30/30 8.2 3.6 54.2% 75.6% 50.8% 54.9% 41.8% 64.1% 36.6%
32 2025 29/29 3.3 2.8 60.9% 65.6% 47.7% 55.9% 40.1% 58.5% 38.0% 2022 13/13 8.7 4.8 54.8% 72.7% 45.1% 58.4% 39.4% 60.0% 32.5%
33 2026 1/1 7.0 2.0 69.0% 76.0% 47.0% 0.0% 0.0% 67.0% 25.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 293/295 2.7 2.8 62.8% 67.1% 50.5% 55.7% 44.5% 60.8% 37.8% — 290/291 8.4 3.0 56.5% 74.1% 49.1% 55.9% 40.7% 63.2% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Roberto Carballes Baena Aljaz Bedene
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2012 1486 100.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 1491 100.9 +0.48 -1.32 0.795 44.1% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.13 2010 1510 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 1554 120.6 -2.56 +0.37 0.966 49.8% — +55 — 50.0% +0.14 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.07 2011 1598 111.4 -3.13 +1.53 0.912 49.2% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.14
22 2015 1603 116.9 -1.36 -0.96 0.802 46.4% — +62 — 28.6% -1.14 1–0 — — -0.20 2012 1628 112.4 -0.63 -2.09 0.811 46.5% +15 -14 — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.05
23 2016 1663 122.2 -0.68 -0.77 0.974 49.2% — +43 — 45.9% -0.54 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 96.7 +0.36 2013 1631 135.7 -0.57 -0.46 0.989 49.7% -24 +25 -80 43.4% -0.46 3–9 (25%) 5–4 (56%) 98.7 -0.37
24 2017 1591 117.8 +2.09 +0.57 1.359 55.0% — +50 — 66.7% +1.25 0–2 1–1 — +0.84 2014 1671 125.5 -2.62 -1.76 0.838 46.8% +7 +10 — 29.4% -1.21 4–2 (67%) 1–5 (17%) 99.9 -0.18
25 2018 1660 135.3 -0.61 -0.31 0.979 49.5% -110 +23 — 45.3% -0.31 5–4 (56%) 11–7 (61%) 106.0 +0.63 2015 1777 143.0 -0.50 -0.29 0.974 49.4% +5 -47 -158 45.2% -0.30 7–2 (78%) 9–5 (64%) 110.1 -0.03
26 2019 1715 141.7 -2.75 +2.19 0.994 50.2% -112 +50 -192 49.0% +0.05 8–8 (50%) 6–8 (43%) 100.6 +0.78 2016 1740 139.8 -0.05 -0.03 0.968 49.2% +1 -8 -110 41.0% -0.41 6–8 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 99.1 +0.06
27 2020 1678 120.1 -4.48 -0.47 0.840 46.6% -94 +71 — 42.9% -0.69 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.46 2017 1816 141.4 +0.23 +0.59 1.031 49.9% -96 -15 -84 50.6% +0.28 7–4 (64%) 6–9 (40%) 103.5 +0.31
28 2021 1730 132.1 -3.52 +1.98 0.942 48.4% -112 +53 — 41.2% -0.50 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 99.0 -0.86 2018 1733 146.7 -0.98 +1.27 0.996 49.7% -89 +112 -31 46.8% -0.17 9–9 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 98.2 -1.19
29 2022 1726 134.1 -2.32 -0.71 0.897 48.3% -101 +37 — 40.8% -0.53 3–4 (43%) 6–6 (50%) 101.3 -0.71 2019 1844 145.1 +0.02 -0.45 0.970 49.6% -71 -22 -134 51.6% -0.02 6–7 (46%) 11–10 (52%) 101.2 -0.41
30 2023 1689 135.3 -1.01 +1.17 1.012 50.1% -110 +98 -173 42.7% -0.50 7–8 (47%) 5–10 (33%) 95.8 -1.42 2020 1799 141.8 +0.66 -2.51 0.855 47.5% -20 +2 — 46.3% -0.15 4–1 (80%) 2–7 (22%) 98.8 -0.46
31 2024 1733 141.2 -1.18 +1.26 0.990 49.7% -60 +49 -204 45.2% -0.35 10–7 (59%) 11–7 (61%) 104.7 -1.86 2021 1774 129.1 +0.73 -0.73 1.019 50.0% -1 -14 -65 49.4% -0.03 5–4 (56%) 9–7 (56%) 100.8 -0.98
32 2025 1656 130.1 -3.93 +1.10 0.917 48.4% +14 +29 — 41.7% -0.60 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) 95.8 +0.34 2022 1661 118.5 -2.51 -2.70 0.811 46.8% +31 +88 — 36.6% -0.76 1–5 (17%) 2–4 (33%) 93.6 +0.07
33 2026 1574 112.7 -2.71 -1.95 0.758 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1797 138.3 -2.00 +0.80 0.963 49.3% -74 +52 -187 44.2% -0.38 44–46 (49%) 53–56 (49%) 101.7 -0.52 — 1893 144.0 -0.36 -0.42 0.960 49.1% -29 +18 -94 45.4% -0.25 53–52 (50%) 66–68 (49%) 101.6 -1.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.