H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Roberto Carballes Baena vs Federico Gaio H2H: 1-0
Roberto Carballes Baena holds a 1–0 lead over Federico Gaio in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Roberto Carballes Baena leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Roberto Carballes Baena won the 2018 Quito third round 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 34
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2018* | Quito | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Roberto Carballes Baena | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Federico Gaio | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberto Carballes Baena | #165 | #49 | 1,071 | 1,798 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Federico Gaio | #1,461 | #124 | 548 | 1,567 | 3 | 15 | 16.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roberto Carballes Baena | Federico Gaio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #131 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #106 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #73 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #254 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #80 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #79 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #425 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2024 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #57 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #129 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |