H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Roberto Carballes Baena vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 1-2
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez holds a 2–1 lead over Roberto Carballes Baena in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Roberto Carballes Baena won the 2018 Gstaad third round 7-6(3) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2018* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Roberto Carballes Baena | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Match data |
| Apr 30, 2015* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | 6-2 6-2 | Roberto Carballes Baena | Match data |
| Apr 12, 2014* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | 6-2 6-7(6) 6-4 | Roberto Carballes Baena | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberto Carballes Baena | #165 | #49 | 1,071 | 1,798 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | #1,009 | #23 | 1,465 | 1,938 | 299 | 353 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roberto Carballes Baena | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #131 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #91 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #106 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #90 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #73 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #80 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2021 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #79 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #65 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2022 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2023 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #62 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2024 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #57 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #36 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2025 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #129 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,853 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #70 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #105 | 1,675 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #144 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 |