H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Roberto Carballes Baena vs James Ward
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Roberto Carballes Baena vs James Ward.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 39
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberto Carballes Baena | #165 | #49 | 1,071 | 1,798 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| James Ward | #1,096 | #89 | 573 | 1,716 | 15 | 50 | 23.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roberto Carballes Baena | James Ward | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #558 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #131 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #270 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #106 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #73 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #250 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #80 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #107 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #79 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #156 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #444 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #843 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2024 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #57 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #129 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |