H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Roberto Carballes Baena vs Juncheng Shang H2H: 0-1
Juncheng Shang holds a 1–0 lead over Roberto Carballes Baena in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juncheng Shang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juncheng Shang won the 2024 US Open second round 6-2 6-3 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
China
Age 21
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2024* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Juncheng Shang | 6-2 6-3 7-6(2) | Roberto Carballes Baena | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberto Carballes Baena | #165 | #49 | 1,071 | 1,798 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Juncheng Shang | #274 | #47 | 1,115 | 1,896 | 38 | 42 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roberto Carballes Baena | Juncheng Shang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #50 | 1,831 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #253 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #274 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #131 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #106 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #73 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2019 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #80 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #79 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #57 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #129 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |