H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Roberto Carballes Baena vs Thiago Monteiro H2H: 0-3
Thiago Monteiro holds a 3–0 lead over Roberto Carballes Baena in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Thiago Monteiro leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Thiago Monteiro won the 2021 Buenos Aires third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
Brazil
Age 32
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2021* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Thiago Monteiro | 6-2 6-3 | Roberto Carballes Baena | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2021* | Cordoba | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Thiago Monteiro | 6-3 6-4 | Roberto Carballes Baena | Match data |
| Feb 28, 2020* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Thiago Monteiro | 6-1 6-4 | Roberto Carballes Baena | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberto Carballes Baena | #165 | #49 | 1,071 | 1,798 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Thiago Monteiro | #290 | #61 | 954 | 1,780 | 81 | 119 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roberto Carballes Baena | Thiago Monteiro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #131 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #106 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #73 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #89 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #80 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #89 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #79 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #71 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #122 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2024 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #57 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2025 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #129 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |