H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Robin Haase vs Carlos Berlocq H2H: 2-2

Robin Haase and Carlos Berlocq are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Carlos Berlocq leads 2–1 on clay, while Robin Haase leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Carlos Berlocq won the 2017 Rome Masters second round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Robin Haase
NED Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Carlos Berlocq
ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 16, 2017* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Carlos Berlocq #68 6-3 7-5 Robin Haase #43 Match data
Feb 14, 2014* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R16 Clay Robin Haase #46 6-2 6-7(4) 6-2 Carlos Berlocq #48 Match data
Jul 20, 2011* Hamburg ATP 500 R64 Clay Carlos Berlocq #80 6-2 6-2 Robin Haase #54 Match data
Jan 19, 2011* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Robin Haase #62 6-4 6-3 7-6(5) Carlos Berlocq #67 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Robin Haase #1,206 #33 1,220 1,860 202 255 44.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Carlos Berlocq #505 #37 1,086 1,853 127 186 40.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Robin Haase Carlos Berlocq
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2006 0–2 0.0% #167 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2007 10–11 47.6% #114 1,618 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2008 12–13 48.0% #116 1,672 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #79 1,454 0 0
23 2010 6–11 35.3% #65 1,691 0 0 2006 5–17 22.7% #132 1,427 0 0
24 2011 25–24 51.0% #45 1,778 0 1 2007 11–15 42.3% #85 1,550 0 0
25 2012 16–25 39.0% #56 1,700 0 2 2008 3–16 15.8% #157 1,450 0 0
26 2013 28–26 51.9% #43 1,852 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2014 15–23 39.5% #83 1,715 0 2 2010 3–3 50.0% #66 1,541 0 0
28 2015 14–20 41.2% #66 1,767 0 2 2011 15–23 39.5% #60 1,672 0 0
29 2016 14–19 42.4% #59 1,756 0 2 2012 23–28 45.1% #66 1,670 0 0
30 2017 25–29 46.3% #42 1,811 0 2 2013 26–24 52.0% #41 1,829 0 1
31 2018 24–28 46.2% #50 1,779 0 2 2014 17–17 50.0% #72 1,728 0 2
32 2019 11–18 37.9% #162 1,685 0 2 2015 7–9 43.8% #111 1,686 0 2
33 2020 0–1 0.0% #197 1,661 0 2 2016 4–6 40.0% #95 1,728 0 2
34 2021 1–3 25.0% #230 1,615 0 2 2017 12–19 38.7% #112 1,693 0 2
35 2022 0–1 0.0% #258 1,568 0 2 2018 1–5 16.7% #139 1,665 0 2
36 2023 1–1 50.0% #756 1,531 0 2 2019 0–3 0.0% #507 1,504 0 2