H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Robin Haase vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 3-5

Fernando Verdasco holds a 5–3 lead over Robin Haase in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 4–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2017 Stockholm third round 6-3 6-1.

NED Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 19, 2017* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Fernando Verdasco #43 6-3 6-1 Robin Haase #44 Match data
Mar 4, 2017* Dubai ATP 500 SF Hard Fernando Verdasco #35 7-6(5) 5-7 6-1 Robin Haase #66 Match data
Nov 2, 2016* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fernando Verdasco #46 6-2 3-2 (ret.) Robin Haase #64 Match data
Apr 23, 2016* Bucharest ATP 250 QF Clay Fernando Verdasco #86 7-6(6) 6-3 Robin Haase #64 Match data
Jun 12, 2015* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R16 Grass Robin Haase #83 7-6(4) 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #42 Match data
Aug 22, 2013* Winston-Salem ATP 250 R16 Hard Fernando Verdasco #30 6-4 6-7(8) 6-3 Robin Haase #59 Match data
Aug 2, 2013* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 QF Clay Robin Haase #68 4-6 6-4 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #33 Match data
Jun 23, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Robin Haase #58 6-3 6-4 4-6 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Robin Haase #1,206 #33 1,220 1,860 202 255 44.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Robin Haase Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 2006 0–2 0.0% #167 1,488 0 0 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 2007 10–11 47.6% #114 1,618 0 0 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 2008 12–13 48.0% #116 1,672 0 0 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2010 6–11 35.3% #65 1,691 0 0 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2011 25–24 51.0% #45 1,778 0 1 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2012 16–25 39.0% #56 1,700 0 2 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2013 28–26 51.9% #43 1,852 0 2 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2014 15–23 39.5% #83 1,715 0 2 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2015 14–20 41.2% #66 1,767 0 2 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2016 14–19 42.4% #59 1,756 0 2 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2017 25–29 46.3% #42 1,811 0 2 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 2018 24–28 46.2% #50 1,779 0 2 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2019 11–18 37.9% #162 1,685 0 2 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 2020 0–1 0.0% #197 1,661 0 2 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 2021 1–3 25.0% #230 1,615 0 2 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 2022 0–1 0.0% #258 1,568 0 2 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 2023 1–1 50.0% #756 1,531 0 2 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7