H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Robin Haase vs Janko Tipsarevic H2H: 1-1
Robin Haase and Janko Tipsarevic are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Robin Haase leads 1–0 on clay, while Janko Tipsarevic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robin Haase won the 2013 Gstaad fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2013* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Robin Haase | 6-2 6-2 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2011* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Janko Tipsarevic | 6-4 7-6(5) | Robin Haase | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin Haase | #1,206 | #33 | 1,220 | 1,860 | 202 | 255 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Janko Tipsarevic | #755 | #8 | 3,320 | 2,072 | 245 | 240 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robin Haase | Janko Tipsarevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #114 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #117 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #116 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #139 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #65 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #49 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #56 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #83 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #9 | 2,006 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2015 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #66 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 48–26 | 64.9% | #9 | 1,972 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #59 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2017 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #42 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #50 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #410 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #162 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #144 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #105 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #230 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #219 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #756 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |