H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Robin Haase vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 1-4
Lukas Rosol holds a 4–1 lead over Robin Haase in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lukas Rosol leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Lukas Rosol won the 2016 Sofia third round 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2016* | Sofia | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Lukas Rosol | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Robin Haase | Match data |
| Mar 17, 2015* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Lukas Rosol | 6-4 6-7(4) 7-6(3) | Robin Haase | Match data |
| Apr 26, 2014* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Lukas Rosol | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Robin Haase | Match data |
| Aug 21, 2013* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Robin Haase | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
| Jul 12, 2012* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Lukas Rosol | 6-4 7-5 | Robin Haase | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin Haase | #1,206 | #33 | 1,220 | 1,860 | 202 | 255 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Lukas Rosol | #1,777 | #26 | 1,290 | 1,921 | 110 | 148 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robin Haase | Lukas Rosol | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #114 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #116 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #65 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #56 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #73 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #83 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2015 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #66 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #59 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #55 | 1,846 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2017 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #42 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2018 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #50 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #203 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #162 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #142 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #180 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #230 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #756 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |