H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Robin Haase vs Mate Pavic H2H: 0-1
Mate Pavic holds a 1–0 lead over Robin Haase in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mate Pavic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mate Pavic won the 2012 S Hertogenbosch third round 6-4 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 33
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2012* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Mate Pavic | 6-4 7-6(2) | Robin Haase | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin Haase | #1,206 | #33 | 1,220 | 1,860 | 202 | 255 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mate Pavic | #974 | #295 | 150 | 1,611 | 3 | 10 | 23.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robin Haase | Mate Pavic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #369 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #412 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #114 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #423 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #116 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #638 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #65 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #933 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #56 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #83 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #66 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #59 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #42 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #50 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #162 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #230 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #756 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |