H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Robin Haase vs Michael Llodra H2H: 1-1
Robin Haase and Michael Llodra are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Llodra won the 2008 Rotterdam quarterfinal 7-6(5) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 46
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2013 | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Clay | Robin Haase | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Michael Llodra | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2008* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Michael Llodra | 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | Robin Haase | Match data |
| Aug 5, 2007 | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Robin Haase | 7-6(3) 7-6(5) | Michael Llodra | Match data |
| Aug 1, 2007* | Washington | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Robin Haase | 6-2 6-7(7) 7-6(4) | Michael Llodra | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin Haase | #1,206 | #33 | 1,220 | 1,860 | 202 | 255 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Michael Llodra | #631 | #21 | 1,575 | 1,901 | 182 | 215 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robin Haase | Michael Llodra | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #114 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #159 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #116 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #89 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #104 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #65 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #41 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #56 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #83 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #93 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2015 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #66 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #40 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #59 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2017 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #42 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #23 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2018 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #50 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,776 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #162 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,842 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #105 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #230 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #756 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |