H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Robin Haase vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 0-1

Nicolas Almagro holds a 1–0 lead over Robin Haase in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Almagro leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2010 Roland Garros first round 6-4 3-6 4-6 7-6(3) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Robin Haase
NED Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Almagro #21 6-4 3-6 4-6 7-6(3) 6-4 Robin Haase #205 Match data May 26, 2010* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Robin Haase #1,206 #33 1,220 1,860 202 258 43.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,079 388 274 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Robin Haase Nicolas Almagro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 2006 0–2 0.0% #167 1,488 0 0 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0
20 2007 10–11 47.6% #114 1,618 0 0 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1
21 2008 12–13 48.0% #116 1,672 0 0 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2
22 — — — — — — — 2008 34–17 66.7% #18 1,771 0 4
23 2010 6–11 35.3% #65 1,691 0 0 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,829 0 5
24 2011 25–24 51.0% #45 1,779 0 1 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,884 0 7
25 2012 16–26 38.1% #56 1,696 0 2 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,876 0 10
26 2013 28–26 51.9% #43 1,852 0 2 2012 54–22 71.1% #11 2,013 0 12
27 2014 15–23 39.5% #83 1,715 0 2 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,962 0 12
28 2015 14–20 41.2% #66 1,766 0 2 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,924 0 12
29 2016 14–20 41.2% #59 1,747 0 2 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12
30 2017 25–29 46.3% #42 1,810 0 2 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,792 0 13
31 2018 24–28 46.2% #50 1,779 0 2 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,835 0 13
32 2019 11–18 37.9% #162 1,686 0 2 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,780 0 13
33 2020 0–1 0.0% #197 1,662 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2021 1–3 25.0% #230 1,616 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2022 0–1 0.0% #258 1,568 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2023 1–1 50.0% #756 1,532 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2024 0–1 0.0% #1202 1,522 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Robin Haase Nicolas Almagro
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — —
19 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 12 17 29 41.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2007 5 8 13 38.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 1 6 7 14.3% 23 10 33 69.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 2008 8 6 14 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2007 9 12 21 42.9% 23 13 36 63.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 4 8 12 33.3% 29 8 37 78.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2010 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 10 11 21 47.6% 18 12 30 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
24 2011 11 14 25 44.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 25 9 34 73.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2012 4 13 17 23.5% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2011 13 12 25 52.0% 32 9 41 78.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2013 12 14 26 46.2% 15 10 25 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 19 11 30 63.3% 30 9 39 76.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
27 2014 3 8 11 27.3% 10 13 23 43.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 17 11 28 60.7% 23 11 34 67.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
28 2015 6 12 18 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2014 1 1 2 50.0% 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — — — — —
29 2016 7 13 20 35.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2015 2 6 8 25.0% 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2017 15 17 32 46.9% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2016 7 11 18 38.9% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 2018 15 15 30 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2017 3 5 8 37.5% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2019 7 10 17 41.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 100 142 242 41.3% 80 82 162 49.4% 22 34 56 39.3% — — — — — 102 110 212 48.1% 269 145 414 65.0% 14 16 30 46.7% 3 3 6 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 457/459 of Robin Haase's and 651/662 of Nicolas Almagro's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Robin Haase Nicolas Almagro
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/2 0.0 0.0 36.4% 100.0% 57.1% — 33.3% 72.7% 56.3%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 9/9 6.7 4.2 56.5% 69.8% 45.4% 51.5% 37.1% 59.5% 37.8%
19 2006 2/2 4.5 3.5 53.2% 65.4% 47.5% 61.3% 35.1% 57.3% 37.1% 2005 35/35 6.1 2.9 62.4% 69.2% 50.2% 66.5% 46.5% 62.0% 36.6%
20 2007 21/21 6.0 2.6 58.8% 72.4% 49.9% 65.1% 35.8% 63.2% 32.7% 2006 47/47 6.7 2.3 60.8% 73.9% 54.5% 68.1% 42.4% 65.8% 38.7%
21 2008 25/25 6.2 2.8 60.6% 71.7% 52.6% 62.0% 44.7% 64.0% 36.9% 2007 59/59 7.8 2.4 61.1% 74.4% 52.1% 58.9% 43.7% 65.7% 37.7%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 49/51 9.1 2.4 59.0% 75.4% 55.1% 62.6% 43.0% 67.0% 40.0%
23 2010 17/17 7.0 3.2 59.3% 74.1% 50.5% 62.0% 40.6% 64.4% 34.2% 2009 53/54 10.4 2.6 59.1% 75.5% 52.2% 55.1% 42.3% 66.0% 36.3%
24 2011 49/49 7.4 2.7 59.2% 70.7% 50.2% 54.4% 44.3% 62.4% 38.8% 2010 64/64 8.2 1.9 59.7% 75.1% 53.6% 55.5% 40.6% 66.4% 37.2%
25 2012 41/42 5.5 2.4 58.5% 72.6% 46.9% 47.4% 37.9% 61.7% 37.1% 2011 70/70 7.8 2.6 55.9% 76.0% 53.9% 57.1% 40.5% 66.0% 37.5%
26 2013 54/54 6.0 2.8 61.7% 71.8% 48.2% 61.4% 47.5% 62.7% 35.6% 2012 71/76 8.7 1.9 56.8% 77.1% 55.4% 60.5% 38.8% 67.8% 37.8%
27 2014 38/38 5.3 2.4 60.9% 69.7% 48.8% 55.8% 38.6% 61.5% 33.7% 2013 65/65 9.6 2.5 57.1% 78.6% 55.4% 58.4% 47.2% 68.7% 39.0%
28 2015 34/34 5.1 2.6 60.1% 69.0% 50.4% 56.7% 44.6% 61.3% 34.0% 2014 23/25 7.0 2.0 55.7% 76.6% 55.0% 58.0% 40.7% 66.8% 37.5%
29 2016 33/34 6.6 2.4 59.0% 73.3% 49.0% 58.2% 47.0% 63.4% 35.7% 2015 38/38 7.6 3.0 56.6% 74.3% 51.8% 56.1% 29.3% 64.7% 35.5%
30 2017 54/54 7.3 3.0 59.3% 73.4% 51.1% 58.4% 40.5% 64.4% 36.8% 2016 44/44 10.0 4.0 54.0% 74.8% 51.9% 53.8% 38.2% 64.3% 36.1%
31 2018 52/52 7.5 3.0 57.4% 72.4% 49.4% 53.7% 46.8% 62.5% 35.7% 2017 22/22 7.0 2.3 55.0% 73.1% 48.6% 42.2% 43.1% 61.8% 35.5%
32 2019 29/29 6.8 3.8 56.1% 73.7% 48.7% 63.8% 38.8% 62.6% 34.6% 2018 1/1 11.0 2.0 56.8% 85.7% 54.2% 83.3% 0.0% 72.1% 21.4%
33 2020 1/1 12.0 4.0 56.3% 76.2% 51.0% 80.0% 28.6% 65.2% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 4/4 9.0 2.3 60.3% 73.8% 53.9% 65.6% 55.2% 65.9% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1/1 6.0 3.0 58.8% 75.0% 25.0% 78.6% — 54.4% 18.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 2/2 9.5 1.5 54.5% 71.2% 52.3% 48.5% 45.0% 62.6% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 457/460 6.5 2.8 59.3% 72.0% 49.5% 57.5% 42.7% 62.8% 35.7% — 651/662 8.3 2.5 58.0% 75.3% 53.3% 58.3% 41.2% 66.0% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Robin Haase Nicolas Almagro
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1511 102.5 +0.97 -0.39 2.063 63.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.01
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1540 123.5 -0.44 -0.86 0.934 48.1% — +48 — 33.3% -0.96 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.67
19 2006 1489 110.0 +2.06 -3.84 0.869 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 — — -0.29 2005 1552 131.3 -0.66 -0.28 0.962 49.6% -60 +64 — 42.7% -0.29 3–8 (27%) 5–14 (26%) — +0.44
20 2007 1619 121.1 0.00 -2.69 0.888 48.7% -29 -30 — 43.1% -0.45 6–2 (75%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.09 2006 1721 147.3 +3.48 +0.92 1.130 52.0% -200 +123 — 56.6% +0.53 6–8 (43%) 9–12 (43%) — -2.25
21 2008 1673 135.7 +0.43 +0.59 1.024 50.3% +64 -65 -158 48.4% -0.16 3–6 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.68 2007 1724 151.2 +2.51 +0.51 1.100 51.6% -85 +74 — 55.1% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 9–13 (41%) — +1.58
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1771 147.2 +3.48 +1.81 1.213 53.3% -180 +206 — 66.4% +0.97 6–8 (43%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.82
23 2010 1692 132.9 +0.65 -0.48 0.961 49.0% +64 — -133 40.0% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.36 2009 1830 149.5 +2.70 -0.46 1.067 51.0% -100 +75 -243 50.7% +0.31 11–7 (61%) 12–22 (35%) — +0.28
24 2011 1779 144.3 -0.26 +1.34 1.032 50.6% -48 -6 -138 54.4% +0.30 8–12 (40%) 8–16 (33%) — +0.39 2010 1885 153.6 +2.97 +1.08 1.108 51.5% -104 +208 -336 59.1% +0.57 18–9 (67%) 19–15 (56%) — +0.21
25 2012 1697 141.9 -0.74 -0.01 0.971 49.2% -73 +151 -117 38.8% -0.40 4–8 (33%) 1–9 (10%) — -0.26 2011 1877 158.8 +3.24 +0.58 1.103 51.5% -72 +241 -277 63.1% +0.58 11–10 (52%) 26–14 (65%) — +2.38
26 2013 1852 144.6 -0.82 -0.70 0.956 49.6% -121 +73 -285 47.5% +0.05 17–8 (68%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.40 2012 2013 163.5 +4.96 +1.63 1.175 52.2% -64 +142 -248 62.9% +0.81 18–5 (78%) 18–23 (44%) — +1.39
27 2014 1716 132.5 -1.56 -2.99 0.876 48.1% -36 +47 -94 42.6% -0.32 8–6 (57%) 1–11 (8%) — +0.05 2013 1963 162.6 +5.10 +1.96 1.247 53.4% +6 +111 -176 61.9% +0.92 8–8 (50%) 17–17 (50%) — +3.89
28 2015 1767 135.3 -1.96 -1.52 0.880 47.9% -87 -38 -12 41.8% -0.60 7–9 (44%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.06 2014 1924 150.9 +2.23 +1.75 1.132 51.4% — +77 — 61.5% +0.54 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.08
29 2016 1748 137.6 -0.31 -0.60 0.974 49.3% -40 -10 -34 43.5% -0.38 5–5 (50%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.19 2015 1796 152.1 +1.64 -0.54 1.007 50.2% +54 +182 — 45.6% -0.48 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) — -3.74
30 2017 1810 158.9 +1.47 +0.65 1.034 50.5% -8 -56 -118 49.3% +0.01 7–14 (33%) 9–13 (41%) — -0.52 2016 1793 148.9 +0.66 -0.29 1.010 49.9% -21 +144 — 50.4% +0.07 9–10 (47%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.05
31 2018 1780 146.8 -0.97 +0.09 0.953 49.4% +10 -86 -41 47.2% -0.18 13–14 (48%) 16–14 (53%) — +1.30 2017 1835 150.4 -0.33 -0.08 0.929 49.1% -81 +97 — 51.1% +0.19 3–3 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.98
32 2019 1686 131.3 -1.19 -1.16 0.924 48.7% +34 -63 +43 40.5% -0.54 4–5 (44%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.27 2018 1780 96.9 -0.24 -0.55 0.765 47.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.20
33 2020 1662 110.2 +0.76 -2.31 0.931 49.1% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1616 115.8 +0.38 -0.57 0.999 49.2% +49 — — 36.4% -0.55 0–1 0–2 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1569 100.6 -4.87 -1.01 0.399 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1533 107.7 -0.45 +0.21 0.935 48.9% — — — 50.0% -0.67 1–1 2–0 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1522 101.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1861 145.6 -0.45 -0.47 0.959 49.4% -26 +15 -87 45.3% -0.23 85–97 (47%) 81–123 (40%) 95.3 -0.03 — 2079 159.4 +2.82 +0.73 1.102 51.5% -73 +138 -255 56.7% +0.45 111–100 (53%) 158–175 (47%) 96.3 +0.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.