H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Robin Haase vs Paolo Lorenzi H2H: 0-2

Paolo Lorenzi holds a 2–0 lead over Robin Haase in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paolo Lorenzi leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paolo Lorenzi won the 2017 Indian Wells Open first round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Robin Haase
NED Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Paolo Lorenzi
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paolo Lorenzi #38 6-4 6-3 Robin Haase #47 Match data Mar 11, 2017* R128 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Paolo Lorenzi #83 6-2 6-3 Robin Haase #61 Match data Jul 30, 2014* R32 Austrian Open Kitzbühel ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Robin Haase #1,206 #33 1,220 1,860 202 258 43.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Paolo Lorenzi #1,033 #33 1,223 1,823 105 181 36.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Robin Haase Paolo Lorenzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2006 0–2 0.0% #167 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2007 10–11 47.6% #114 1,618 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2008 12–13 48.0% #116 1,672 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2010 6–11 35.3% #65 1,691 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2011 25–24 51.0% #45 1,779 0 1 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,503 0 0
25 2012 16–26 38.1% #56 1,696 0 2 2007 1–1 50.0% #294 1,492 0 0
26 2013 28–26 51.9% #43 1,852 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2014 15–23 39.5% #83 1,715 0 2 2009 0–1 0.0% #84 1,437 0 0
28 2015 14–20 41.2% #66 1,766 0 2 2010 2–14 12.5% #143 1,435 0 0
29 2016 14–20 41.2% #59 1,747 0 2 2011 2–3 40.0% #108 1,516 0 0
30 2017 25–29 46.3% #42 1,810 0 2 2012 8–17 32.0% #64 1,604 0 0
31 2018 24–28 46.2% #50 1,779 0 2 2013 13–24 35.1% #109 1,646 0 0
32 2019 11–18 37.9% #162 1,686 0 2 2014 11–14 44.0% #64 1,663 0 0
33 2020 0–1 0.0% #197 1,662 0 2 2015 7–18 28.0% #68 1,615 0 0
34 2021 1–3 25.0% #230 1,616 0 2 2016 24–25 49.0% #40 1,793 0 1
35 2022 0–1 0.0% #258 1,568 0 2 2017 24–32 42.9% #43 1,700 0 1
36 2023 1–1 50.0% #756 1,532 0 2 2018 6–15 28.6% #109 1,632 0 1
37 2024 0–1 0.0% #1202 1,522 0 2 2019 6–10 37.5% #115 1,628 0 1
38 — — — — — — — 2020 1–4 20.0% #146 1,536 0 1
39 — — — — — — — 2021 0–2 0.0% #274 1,493 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Robin Haase Paolo Lorenzi
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 5 8 13 38.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 8 6 14 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 11 14 25 44.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2012 4 13 17 23.5% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2013 12 14 26 46.2% 15 10 25 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 3 8 11 27.3% 10 13 23 43.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2015 6 12 18 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2010 0 6 6 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2016 7 13 20 35.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2017 15 17 32 46.9% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
31 2018 15 15 30 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 8 12 20 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 2019 7 10 17 41.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2014 3 4 7 42.9% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
33 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 3 7 10 30.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 2021 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 10 12 22 45.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
35 2022 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 9 17 26 34.6% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0%
36 2023 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 3 4 7 42.9% 2 9 11 18.2% 1 2 3 33.3%
37 2024 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2019 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 100 142 242 41.3% 80 82 162 49.4% 22 34 56 39.3% — 43 79 122 35.2% 57 81 138 41.3% 5 21 26 19.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 457/459 of Robin Haase's and 283/286 of Paolo Lorenzi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Robin Haase Paolo Lorenzi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2006 2/2 4.5 3.5 53.2% 65.4% 47.5% 61.3% 35.1% 57.3% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 21/21 6.0 2.6 58.8% 72.4% 49.9% 65.1% 35.8% 63.2% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 25/25 6.2 2.8 60.6% 71.7% 52.6% 62.0% 44.7% 64.0% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 17/17 7.0 3.2 59.3% 74.1% 50.5% 62.0% 40.6% 64.4% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 49/49 7.4 2.7 59.2% 70.7% 50.2% 54.4% 44.3% 62.4% 38.8% 2006 1/1 0.0 1.0 53.3% 42.5% 48.6% 41.7% 37.5% 45.3% 40.0%
25 2012 41/42 5.5 2.4 58.5% 72.6% 46.9% 47.4% 37.9% 61.7% 37.1% 2007 2/2 0.5 3.0 66.3% 62.4% 44.0% 46.4% 60.0% 55.5% 27.5%
26 2013 54/54 6.0 2.8 61.7% 71.8% 48.2% 61.4% 47.5% 62.7% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 38/38 5.3 2.4 60.9% 69.7% 48.8% 55.8% 38.6% 61.5% 33.7% 2009 1/1 2.0 2.0 54.3% 64.0% 28.6% 33.3% — 47.8% 17.9%
28 2015 34/34 5.1 2.6 60.1% 69.0% 50.4% 56.7% 44.6% 61.3% 34.0% 2010 16/16 4.1 4.3 61.0% 64.7% 44.6% 56.6% 27.2% 56.9% 33.2%
29 2016 33/34 6.6 2.4 59.0% 73.3% 49.0% 58.2% 47.0% 63.4% 35.7% 2011 5/5 1.8 2.8 65.2% 66.1% 42.6% 51.9% 38.0% 57.9% 36.6%
30 2017 54/54 7.3 3.0 59.3% 73.4% 51.1% 58.4% 40.5% 64.4% 36.8% 2012 25/25 2.6 2.0 61.5% 63.8% 48.2% 50.5% 34.3% 57.8% 34.1%
31 2018 52/52 7.5 3.0 57.4% 72.4% 49.4% 53.7% 46.8% 62.5% 35.7% 2013 37/37 2.9 2.3 57.2% 67.7% 49.8% 52.7% 36.3% 60.1% 36.2%
32 2019 29/29 6.8 3.8 56.1% 73.7% 48.7% 63.8% 38.8% 62.6% 34.6% 2014 25/25 3.8 2.1 57.6% 70.1% 48.9% 60.1% 48.5% 61.1% 39.9%
33 2020 1/1 12.0 4.0 56.3% 76.2% 51.0% 80.0% 28.6% 65.2% 32.4% 2015 25/25 4.2 2.6 56.5% 66.9% 49.3% 51.8% 40.9% 58.6% 31.0%
34 2021 4/4 9.0 2.3 60.3% 73.8% 53.9% 65.6% 55.2% 65.9% 34.0% 2016 47/49 4.0 2.6 56.3% 69.0% 48.1% 55.5% 43.8% 60.0% 37.0%
35 2022 1/1 6.0 3.0 58.8% 75.0% 25.0% 78.6% — 54.4% 18.2% 2017 55/56 4.5 2.8 58.5% 69.4% 52.7% 56.4% 38.4% 62.3% 34.9%
36 2023 2/2 9.5 1.5 54.5% 71.2% 52.3% 48.5% 45.0% 62.6% 35.0% 2018 21/21 5.4 3.4 57.6% 71.0% 45.0% 61.9% 37.0% 59.9% 33.1%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 16/16 5.0 3.3 60.6% 71.1% 51.4% 67.4% 45.2% 63.4% 30.6%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 5/5 2.8 3.0 56.9% 67.8% 43.1% 48.1% 24.2% 57.0% 33.4%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 2/2 2.5 2.5 61.3% 61.1% 32.2% 58.3% 50.0% 49.3% 25.6%
Career — 457/460 6.5 2.8 59.3% 72.0% 49.5% 57.5% 42.7% 62.8% 35.7% — 283/286 3.9 2.7 58.3% 68.1% 48.8% 55.8% 39.3% 60.0% 34.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Robin Haase Paolo Lorenzi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2006 1489 110.0 +2.06 -3.84 0.869 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 — — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 1619 121.1 0.00 -2.69 0.888 48.7% -29 -30 — 43.1% -0.45 6–2 (75%) 3–4 (43%) 105.3 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 1673 135.7 +0.43 +0.59 1.024 50.3% +64 -65 -158 48.4% -0.16 3–6 (33%) 6–6 (50%) 98.6 -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 1692 132.9 +0.65 -0.48 0.961 49.0% +64 — -133 40.0% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 4–8 (33%) 98.1 -0.36 2005 1469 94.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 1779 144.3 -0.26 +1.34 1.032 50.6% -48 -6 -138 54.4% +0.30 8–12 (40%) 8–16 (33%) 95.0 +0.39 2006 1504 104.3 +3.27 -1.79 0.732 42.8% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — -0.08
25 2012 1697 141.9 -0.74 -0.01 0.971 49.2% -73 +151 -117 38.8% -0.40 4–8 (33%) 1–9 (10%) 90.6 -0.26 2007 1493 97.8 -0.64 -3.08 0.618 43.5% — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 1–1 — -0.04
26 2013 1852 144.6 -0.82 -0.70 0.956 49.6% -121 +73 -285 47.5% +0.05 17–8 (68%) 10–14 (42%) 107.5 +0.40 2008 1459 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 1716 132.5 -1.56 -2.99 0.876 48.1% -36 +47 -94 42.6% -0.32 8–6 (57%) 1–11 (8%) 94.5 +0.05 2009 1438 104.3 -4.82 +0.04 0.344 34.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
28 2015 1767 135.3 -1.96 -1.52 0.880 47.9% -87 -38 -12 41.8% -0.60 7–9 (44%) 6–7 (46%) 100.8 -0.06 2010 1435 112.9 -3.79 -3.23 0.770 45.2% +6 +72 +28 20.0% -1.85 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 97.7 -0.07
29 2016 1748 137.6 -0.31 -0.60 0.974 49.3% -40 -10 -34 43.5% -0.38 5–5 (50%) 9–8 (53%) 101.8 -0.19 2011 1517 125.6 -0.71 +1.76 0.870 47.1% -1 — — 45.5% -1.00 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.31
30 2017 1810 158.9 +1.47 +0.65 1.034 50.5% -8 -56 -118 49.3% +0.01 7–14 (33%) 9–13 (41%) 95.5 -0.52 2012 1604 133.1 -3.58 -1.74 0.808 45.7% -7 -40 -150 33.9% -1.24 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 101.5 -0.29
31 2018 1780 146.8 -0.97 +0.09 0.953 49.4% +10 -86 -41 47.2% -0.18 13–14 (48%) 16–14 (53%) 101.6 +1.30 2013 1647 139.6 -1.95 -1.10 0.906 48.1% -26 -59 -191 36.5% -0.84 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 -0.92
32 2019 1686 131.3 -1.19 -1.16 0.924 48.7% +34 -63 +43 40.5% -0.54 4–5 (44%) 6–10 (38%) 96.4 +0.27 2014 1664 133.8 -1.37 +1.94 1.025 50.4% -26 +44 -207 42.1% -0.40 2–6 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 95.3 +0.70
33 2020 1662 110.2 +0.76 -2.31 0.931 49.1% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.16 2015 1615 126.4 -3.80 -3.71 0.748 45.0% +9 +14 — 31.7% -0.88 5–2 (71%) 2–8 (20%) 98.7 +0.18
34 2021 1616 115.8 +0.38 -0.57 0.999 49.2% +49 — — 36.4% -0.55 0–1 0–2 — -0.14 2016 1793 148.1 -2.03 -0.06 0.925 48.8% -53 -16 -398 46.8% -0.22 11–6 (65%) 10–11 (48%) 108.4 +1.05
35 2022 1569 100.6 -4.87 -1.01 0.399 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11 2017 1701 139.0 -1.35 -1.16 0.925 48.8% -33 +63 -290 45.9% -0.32 8–11 (42%) 15–16 (48%) 96.7 +2.90
36 2023 1533 107.7 -0.45 +0.21 0.935 48.9% — — — 50.0% -0.67 1–1 2–0 — -0.20 2018 1632 123.3 -2.86 -2.73 0.824 47.1% +52 -8 -190 35.7% -0.70 0–4 (0%) 5–7 (42%) 94.8 +0.77
37 2024 1522 101.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.11 2019 1629 124.6 -0.47 -3.08 0.836 47.5% +77 -70 — 37.0% -0.67 5–3 (63%) 7–10 (41%) 101.2 +1.08
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1537 109.2 -1.98 -0.85 0.778 45.2% +108 — — 16.7% -1.67 1–0 0–1 — +0.68
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1494 93.1 -2.75 -1.01 0.505 38.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.30
Career — 1861 145.6 -0.45 -0.47 0.959 49.4% -26 +15 -87 45.3% -0.23 85–97 (47%) 81–123 (40%) 95.3 -0.03 — 1824 134.2 -2.16 -1.27 0.869 47.5% -9 +4 -201 38.6% -0.71 41–46 (47%) 51–71 (42%) 98.6 +2.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.