H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Robin Haase vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 1-0
Robin Haase holds a 1–0 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Robin Haase leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Robin Haase won the 2011 Nice fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2012 | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Robin Haase | 6-4 7-6(9) | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| May 19, 2011* | Nice | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Robin Haase | 6-2 6-4 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin Haase | #1,206 | #33 | 1,220 | 1,860 | 202 | 255 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Robin Haase | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #114 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #116 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #65 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #56 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #83 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #66 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #59 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #42 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #50 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #162 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #230 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #756 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |