H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Robin Soderling vs Benjamin Becker H2H: 3-0
Robin Soderling holds a 3–0 lead over Benjamin Becker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Robin Soderling leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Robin Soderling won the 2010 Stockholm fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 41
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2010* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Robin Soderling | 6-3 6-3 | Benjamin Becker | Match data |
| Oct 9, 2008* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Robin Soderling | 7-5 6-3 | Benjamin Becker | Match data |
| May 9, 2007* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Robin Soderling | 6-3 6-3 | Benjamin Becker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin Soderling | #195 | #4 | 6,055 | 2,172 | 285 | 166 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 10 |
| Benjamin Becker | #1,074 | #35 | 1,098 | 1,851 | 153 | 215 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robin Soderling | Benjamin Becker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #444 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #163 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #60 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #34 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #41 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #17 | 1,959 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #8 | 2,070 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #5 | 2,118 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 34–9 | 79.1% | #13 | 2,127 | 0 | 10 | 2007 | 21–30 | 41.2% | #84 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #129 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #40 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #304 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #79 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #97 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #519 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |