H2H data updated: 2026-10-18 00:00 UTC

Robin Soderling vs John Van Lottum H2H: 1-0

Robin Soderling holds a 1–0 lead over John Van Lottum in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Robin Soderling leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robin Soderling won the 2003 Shanghai Masters round of 32 6-2 6-0.

SWE Age 42 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
NED Age 50 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Robin Soderling #94 6-2 6-0 John Van Lottum Match data Sep 25, 2003* R32 Shanghai Masters ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Robin Soderling #195 #4 6,055 2,174 285 168 62.9% 0 1 0 2 7 10
John Van Lottum — — — 1,719 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Robin Soderling John Van Lottum
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 1–1 50.0% #444 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 1–5 16.7% #163 1,553 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 10–6 62.5% #60 1,728 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 31–27 53.4% #34 1,819 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2005 16–18 47.1% #77 1,737 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 2006 33–22 60.0% #25 1,823 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2007 22–15 59.5% #41 1,832 0 2 — — — — — — —
23 2008 40–20 66.7% #17 1,948 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 2009 44–23 65.7% #8 2,097 0 4 — — — — — — —
25 2010 53–22 70.7% #5 2,121 0 6 — — — — — — —
26 2011 34–9 79.1% #13 2,127 0 10 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Robin Soderling John Van Lottum
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2001 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 7 4 11 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 17 15 32 53.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 7 10 17 41.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2006 19 11 30 63.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 2007 10 6 16 62.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 3 6 9 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
23 2008 25 13 38 65.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 1999 17 13 30 56.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2009 26 16 42 61.9% 15 6 21 71.4% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2010 35 15 50 70.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2011 19 3 22 86.4% 13 5 18 72.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 6 8 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 167 96 263 63.5% 71 49 120 59.2% 26 17 43 60.5% 21 6 27 77.8% — 30 46 76 39.5% 13 27 40 32.5% 13 15 28 46.4% 4 7 11 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Robin Soderling John Van Lottum
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2001 1519 112.1 +0.27 +0.13 1.047 50.2% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 1554 115.3 -3.43 -0.70 0.809 46.1% +62 -67 — 31.3% -1.25 0–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 1729 131.0 +1.72 +1.37 1.132 52.0% -13 — -32 57.1% +0.55 2–1 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 102.6 -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1820 148.4 +1.68 +0.70 1.041 50.8% +14 -282 -138 53.4% +0.31 9–12 (43%) 16–13 (55%) 101.1 -3.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1738 135.0 +0.73 -0.84 0.986 49.9% +56 -187 -96 49.4% +0.06 5–4 (56%) 10–12 (45%) 100.6 -0.02 1996 1491 106.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.35
21 2006 1823 152.2 +4.87 +2.04 1.200 52.9% 0 -152 -111 59.2% +0.64 8–10 (44%) 10–14 (42%) 93.1 -0.90 1997 1631 121.6 — — — — -56 -46 +18 64.5% +0.77 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.2 -0.05
22 2007 1832 149.5 +2.84 +2.66 1.176 52.9% +14 -116 -76 60.2% +0.80 8–8 (50%) 8–8 (50%) 99.2 -1.51 1998 1612 120.7 — — — — -50 -79 +129 40.7% -0.59 5–3 (63%) 3–7 (30%) 101.6 +0.05
23 2008 1948 162.9 +6.87 +1.96 1.279 53.7% +29 -144 -139 62.9% +1.10 11–6 (65%) 8–17 (32%) 99.9 -3.43 1999 1662 128.3 — — — — +36 -181 +3 49.1% -0.33 6–6 (50%) 13–3 (81%) 107.6 +1.68
24 2009 2098 167.1 +5.93 +3.27 1.268 53.8% -49 -40 -206 63.7% +0.99 7–9 (44%) 16–17 (48%) 97.2 -1.00 2000 1517 104.0 — — — — +57 — — 18.5% -2.33 0–2 0–2 — +0.38
25 2010 2122 171.5 +4.91 +4.01 1.222 53.4% -9 +7 -147 65.3% +1.12 14–8 (64%) 11–10 (52%) 100.0 -1.54 2001 1584 111.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.87 0–1 1–1 — -0.48
26 2011 2128 166.5 +4.27 +3.85 1.257 53.8% +23 +78 -111 71.2% +1.27 8–1 (89%) 10–7 (59%) 106.4 -0.37 2002 1624 118.0 — — — — -2 -68 — 50.0% -0.30 0–1 1–1 — +0.19
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1599 123.9 -1.54 -1.36 0.912 48.4% -3 +14 -27 46.7% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 101.1 +0.37
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1512 123.3 -1.67 -2.93 0.813 47.0% +60 +41 +27 37.5% -1.07 0–6 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 96.3 -0.92
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1511 103.1 +0.34 +3.36 0.751 46.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.12
Career — 2175 163.7 +4.10 +2.30 1.175 52.7% +5 -76 -120 60.7% +0.79 72–60 (55%) 96–105 (48%) 99.2 -2.84 — 1719 126.6 -1.54 -1.86 0.869 47.8% +15 -52 +48 43.0% -0.64 15–25 (38%) 27–20 (57%) 100.9 +0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.