H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Robin Soderling vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 3-0
Robin Soderling holds a 3–0 lead over Justin Gimelstob in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Robin Soderling leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Robin Soderling won the 2006 Cincinnati Masters third round 6-3 2-6 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 41
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2006* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Robin Soderling | 6-3 2-6 7-6(6) | Justin Gimelstob | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2006* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Robin Soderling | 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 7-6(7) | Justin Gimelstob | Match data |
| Sep 26, 2003* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Robin Soderling | 6-4 6-4 | Justin Gimelstob | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin Soderling | #195 | #4 | 6,055 | 2,172 | 285 | 166 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 10 |
| Justin Gimelstob | #841 | #63 | 733 | 1,721 | 107 | 171 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robin Soderling | Justin Gimelstob | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #444 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #163 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #60 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #34 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #104 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #41 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #17 | 1,959 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #8 | 2,070 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #5 | 2,118 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 34–9 | 79.1% | #13 | 2,127 | 0 | 10 | 2003 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #162 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #104 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #556 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |