H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Robin Soderling vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 3-3

Robin Soderling and Marcos Baghdatis are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Robin Soderling leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Marcos Baghdatis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marcos Baghdatis won the 2009 Stockholm semifinal W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Robin Soderling
SWE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Marcos Baghdatis
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 24, 2009* Stockholm ATP 250 SF Hard Marcos Baghdatis #66 (w/o) Robin Soderling #10 Match data
Jan 22, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #97 3-6 7-5 6-3 6-3 Robin Soderling #17 Match data
Feb 21, 2008* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Robin Soderling #59 6-3 3-6 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #21 Match data
Jun 15, 2007* Halle ATP 500 R16 Grass Marcos Baghdatis #18 6-7(9) 6-4 6-3 Robin Soderling #28 Match data
Jan 6, 2007* Doha ATP 250 QF Hard Robin Soderling #25 6-3 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #12 Match data
Aug 25, 2006* New Haven ATP 250 R16 Hard Robin Soderling #41 6-3 6-7(3) 7-5 Marcos Baghdatis #8 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Robin Soderling #195 #4 6,055 2,172 285 166 63.2% 0 1 0 2 7 10
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Robin Soderling Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 1–1 50.0% #444 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 1–5 16.7% #163 1,554 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 10–6 62.5% #60 1,728 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 31–26 54.4% #34 1,824 0 1 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 2005 16–18 47.1% #77 1,737 0 2 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2006 33–22 60.0% #25 1,823 0 2 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2007 22–15 59.5% #41 1,831 0 2 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2008 40–19 67.8% #17 1,959 0 3 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2009 44–23 65.7% #8 2,070 0 4 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2010 53–22 70.7% #5 2,118 0 6 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2011 34–9 79.1% #13 2,127 0 10 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 — — — — — — — 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 — — — — — — — 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4