H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Robin Soderling vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 5-2

Robin Soderling holds a 5–2 lead over Radek Stepanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Robin Soderling leads 3–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Robin Soderling won the 2011 Brisbane semifinal 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Robin Soderling
SWE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Radek Stepanek
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 8, 2011* Brisbane ATP 250 SF Hard Robin Soderling #5 6-3 7-5 Radek Stepanek #62 Match data
Jan 10, 2009* Brisbane ATP 250 QF Hard Radek Stepanek #26 2-6 6-4 6-3 Robin Soderling #17 Match data
Apr 22, 2008* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Robin Soderling #49 6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 Radek Stepanek #26 Match data
Mar 1, 2008* Memphis ATP 250 SF Hard Robin Soderling #42 7-6(2) 6-3 Radek Stepanek #31 Match data
May 20, 2006* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Radek Stepanek #16 6-3 6-2 Robin Soderling #54 Match data
Aug 10, 2005* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Robin Soderling #45 6-3 6-4 Radek Stepanek #17 Match data
Feb 6, 2005* Milan ATP 250 F Carpet Robin Soderling #37 6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(5) Radek Stepanek #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Robin Soderling #195 #4 6,055 2,172 285 166 63.2% 0 1 0 2 7 10
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Robin Soderling Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 1–1 50.0% #444 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 1–5 16.7% #163 1,554 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 10–6 62.5% #60 1,728 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 31–26 54.4% #34 1,824 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 2005 16–18 47.1% #77 1,737 0 2 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
21 2006 33–22 60.0% #25 1,823 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2007 22–15 59.5% #41 1,831 0 2 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 2008 40–19 67.8% #17 1,959 0 3 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 2009 44–23 65.7% #8 2,070 0 4 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 2010 53–22 70.7% #5 2,118 0 6 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 2011 34–9 79.1% #13 2,127 0 10 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5
38 — — — — — — — 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5