H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Robin Soderling vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 2-0
Robin Soderling holds a 2–0 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Robin Soderling leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robin Soderling won the 2010 Marseille fourth round 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 41
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2010* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Robin Soderling | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Feb 5, 2005* | Milan | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Robin Soderling | 6-3 6-2 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin Soderling | #195 | #4 | 6,055 | 2,172 | 285 | 166 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 10 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Robin Soderling | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #444 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #163 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #60 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #34 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2007 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #41 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2008 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #17 | 1,959 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #8 | 2,070 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2010 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #5 | 2,118 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | 34–9 | 79.1% | #13 | 2,127 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |