H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Rod Laver vs Anand Amritraj H2H: 2-0

Rod Laver holds a 2–0 lead over Anand Amritraj in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rod Laver leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rod Laver won the 1974 Bretton Woods quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rod Laver
AUS Age 88 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Anand Amritraj
IND Age 74 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rod Laver #4 6-4 6-3 Anand Amritraj Match data Aug 10, 1974* QF Bretton Woods ATP 250 Clay
Rod Laver 6-3 6-3 Anand Amritraj Match data Nov 3, 1973* SF Hong Kong Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rod Laver #662 #3 0 2,303 570 145 79.7% 5 0 0 0 64 69
Anand Amritraj — — — 1,640 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rod Laver Anand Amritraj
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
29 1968 73–19 79.3% — 1,879 1 10 — — — — — — —
30 1969 97–14 87.4% — 2,162 5 26 — — — — — — —
31 1970 89–15 85.6% — 2,216 5 39 — — — — — — —
32 1971 85–20 81.0% — 2,158 5 46 — — — — — — —
33 1972 50–16 75.8% — 2,018 5 51 — — — — — — —
34 1973 67–16 80.7% #8 2,103 5 58 — — — — — — —
35 1974 42–9 82.4% #4 2,124 5 64 — — — — — — —
36 1975 49–12 80.3% #10 2,100 5 69 — — — — — — —
37 1976 9–11 45.0% #73 2,006 5 69 — — — — — — —
38 1977 5–9 35.7% #106 1,937 5 69 — — — — — — —
39 1978 4–3 57.1% #216 1,926 5 69 — — — — — — —
40 1979 0–1 0.0% #662 1,909 5 69 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rod Laver Anand Amritraj
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 3 4 7 42.9% 5 8 13 38.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 7 7 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 3 9 12 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 4 7 11 36.4%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 3 6 9 33.3% 0 7 7 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 8 9 11.1%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 2 1 3 66.7% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 3 6 9 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
29 1968 16 6 22 72.7% 31 9 40 77.5% 17 2 19 89.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1969 21 4 25 84.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 34 3 37 91.9% 30 3 33 90.9% 1982 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 1970 33 3 36 91.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 27 6 33 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1971 27 4 31 87.1% 14 6 20 70.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 34 7 41 82.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1972 8 6 14 57.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 30 5 35 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1973 18 3 21 85.7% 19 6 25 76.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 28 6 34 82.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1974 12 2 14 85.7% 15 0 15 100.0% — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1975 19 2 21 90.5% 21 7 28 75.0% — — — — 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1976 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1977 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1978 — — — — — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1979 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 160 36 196 81.6% 129 41 170 75.9% 88 16 104 84.6% 193 52 245 78.8% — 22 46 68 32.4% 23 50 73 31.5% 18 21 39 46.2% 10 34 44 22.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rod Laver Anand Amritraj
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1493 104.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.05
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1468 94.4 — — — — — — — 12.5% -2.63 0–1 — — -0.08
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1483 109.9 — — — — +13 +77 +34 51.2% -0.12 0–4 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 95.8 +1.58
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1515 120.5 — — — — +21 -9 +12 37.5% -0.87 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +0.19
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1601 128.4 — — — — -130 -50 -5 38.5% -0.76 2–5 (29%) 4–6 (40%) 97.5 -0.34
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1537 120.8 — — — — -39 -7 — 34.6% -1.12 5–7 (42%) 4–6 (40%) 101.1 +1.58
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1460 124.2 — — — — +12 -10 — 23.0% -1.77 2–6 (25%) 2–5 (29%) 95.6 +0.72
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1534 119.4 — — — — -11 -101 +83 42.9% -0.37 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 +1.17
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1556 117.8 — — — — -30 -65 — 45.1% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 100.0 +2.57
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1526 124.8 — — — — -7 -46 — 31.0% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 98.7 +0.40
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1562 126.8 — — — — -41 -54 — 41.4% -0.04 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 97.1 -0.17
29 1968 1880 130.3 — — — — +5 -6 +3 74.4% +1.65 15–6 (71%) — — -0.22 1981 1572 124.5 — — — — -27 — +56 44.4% -0.37 1–4 (20%) 0–2 — +0.35
30 1969 2162 149.8 — — — — +113 -174 +143 76.7% +1.93 22–7 (76%) — — -1.40 1982 1559 101.6 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.72 0–1 1–1 — +0.34
31 1970 2216 155.8 — — — — +205 -202 +12 76.8% +1.87 21–6 (78%) 6–2 (75%) 105.7 -1.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1971 2158 162.7 — — — — +162 -164 0 71.8% +1.59 26–7 (79%) 11–14 (44%) 99.7 -5.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1972 2018 162.7 — — — — +115 -23 +112 69.6% +1.41 13–11 (54%) 7–10 (41%) 89.2 -3.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1973 2104 156.6 — — — — +130 -106 -10 73.5% +1.55 18–7 (72%) 17–10 (63%) 102.6 -2.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1974 2124 154.5 — — — — +39 +3 — 73.2% +1.66 12–3 (80%) 6–3 (67%) 105.2 -0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1975 2100 163.1 — — — — +101 -5 — 71.6% +1.53 16–7 (70%) 14–11 (56%) 100.3 -2.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1976 2006 156.1 — — — — +89 +18 — 46.0% -0.38 2–3 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 102.1 -2.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1977 1937 147.8 — — — — +75 — +86 44.4% -0.42 1–4 (20%) — — -2.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1978 1926 125.9 — — — — +45 — — 50.0% 0.00 2–0 1–1 — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1979 1910 103.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2303 159.0 — — — — +120 -67 +61 72.3% +1.57 148–62 (70%) 69–53 (57%) 102.7 -3.39 — 1641 128.3 — — — — -31 -29 +33 37.4% -0.80 20–43 (32%) 25–40 (38%) 90.5 +3.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.