H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Rod Laver vs Andres Gimeno H2H: 15-6
Rod Laver holds a 15–6 lead over Andres Gimeno in their ATP head-to-head. Across 21 main-draw meetings, they are tied 4–4 on clay, while Rod Laver leads 4–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Rod Laver won the 1971 Vancouver Wct quarterfinal 6-2 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 87
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
15
–
6
21 main draw meetings
ESP
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 1971* | Vancouver Wct | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Rod Laver | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | Andres Gimeno | Match data |
| Nov 20, 1970* | Wembley | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Rod Laver | 6-1 4-6 9-8 | Andres Gimeno | Match data |
| Aug 24, 1970* | Fort Worth | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Rod Laver | 6-4 6-4 | Andres Gimeno | Match data |
| Jul 16, 1970 | Champions Classic | ATP 250 | RR | Carpet | Rod Laver | 4-6 4-6 6-1 6-3 6-2 | Andres Gimeno | Match data |
| Feb 17, 1970* | Miami | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Andres Gimeno | 4-6 11-9 7-5 | Rod Laver | Match data |
| Nov 13, 1969* | Barcelona 2 | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Andres Gimeno | 10-8 2-6 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Rod Laver | Match data |
| Oct 10, 1969* | Las Vegas | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Rod Laver | 4-6 8-6 6-2 | Andres Gimeno | Match data |
| Aug 21, 1969 | Baltimore | ATP 250 | RR | Grass | Rod Laver | 6-4 6-3 4-6 6-1 | Andres Gimeno | Match data |
| Jun 8, 1969* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Rod Laver | 3-6 6-3 6-4 6-3 | Andres Gimeno | Match data |
| May 22, 1969 | Amsterdam | ATP 250 | RR | Clay | Andres Gimeno | 6-3 6-2 | Rod Laver | Match data |
| Feb 3, 1969* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | F | Grass | Rod Laver | 6-3 6-4 7-5 | Andres Gimeno | Match data |
| Dec 12, 1968* | Nashville | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Rod Laver | 6-4 11-9 | Andres Gimeno | Match data |
| Nov 28, 1968 | New York 3 | ATP 250 | BR | Carpet | Rod Laver | 6-4 6-3 | Andres Gimeno | Match data |
| Nov 2, 1968* | La Paz Ntl | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Rod Laver | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | Andres Gimeno | Match data |
| Oct 31, 1968 | Lima Ntl | ATP 250 | RR | Clay | Andres Gimeno | 6-1 6-2 | Rod Laver | Match data |
| Oct 27, 1968* | Sao Paulo Ntl 2 | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Rod Laver | 6-2 2-6 6-3 | Andres Gimeno | Match data |
| Oct 10, 1968* | Corpus Christi Ntl | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Rod Laver | 6-2 6-4 | Andres Gimeno | Match data |
| Sep 27, 1968 | Midland Ntl | ATP 250 | BR | Hard | Andres Gimeno | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Rod Laver | Match data |
| May 7, 1968* | Wembley Ntl 2 | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Rod Laver | 9-7 8-6 11-9 | Andres Gimeno | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1968* | Paris Ntl | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Andres Gimeno | 9-7 6-1 | Rod Laver | Match data |
| Mar 18, 1968 | Sao Paulo Ntl 1 | ATP 250 | RR | Clay | Rod Laver | 11-9 2-6 8-6 | Andres Gimeno | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rod Laver | #662 | #3 | 0 | 2,300 | 576 | 147 | 79.7% | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 72 |
| Andres Gimeno | #150 | #49 | 0 | 2,038 | 246 | 131 | 65.3% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rod Laver | Andres Gimeno | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 29 | 1968 | 73–19 | 79.3% | — | 1,881 | 1 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1969 | 97–14 | 87.4% | — | 2,161 | 5 | 29 | 1968 | 48–27 | 64.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1970 | 89–15 | 85.6% | — | 2,213 | 5 | 42 | 1969 | 47–21 | 69.1% | — | 1,933 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1971 | 85–20 | 81.0% | — | 2,155 | 5 | 49 | 1970 | 41–25 | 62.1% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 1972 | 50–16 | 75.8% | — | 2,016 | 5 | 54 | 1971 | 45–26 | 63.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 1973 | 67–16 | 80.7% | #8 | 2,088 | 5 | 61 | 1972 | 53–23 | 69.7% | — | 1,899 | 1 | 12 |
| 35 | 1974 | 45–10 | 81.8% | #4 | 2,115 | 5 | 67 | 1973 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #136 | 1,792 | 1 | 12 |
| 36 | 1975 | 52–13 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,087 | 5 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1976 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #73 | 1,995 | 5 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1977 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,927 | 5 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #216 | 1,917 | 5 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,901 | 5 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |