H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Rod Laver vs Premjit Lall H2H: 3-0
Rod Laver holds a 3–0 lead over Premjit Lall in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Rod Laver leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rod Laver won the 1970 South Orange third round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 87
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
IND
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 1970* | South Orange | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Rod Laver | 6-0 6-4 | Premjit Lall | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1970* | London / Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Rod Laver | 6-3 6-4 | Premjit Lall | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1969* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Rod Laver | 3-6 4-6 6-3 6-0 6-0 | Premjit Lall | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rod Laver | #662 | #3 | 0 | 2,300 | 576 | 147 | 79.7% | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 72 |
| Premjit Lall | #326 | #105 | 0 | 1,696 | 55 | 66 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rod Laver | Premjit Lall | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 22–15 | 59.5% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1968 | 73–19 | 79.3% | — | 1,881 | 1 | 13 | 1970 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1969 | 97–14 | 87.4% | — | 2,161 | 5 | 29 | 1971 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1970 | 89–15 | 85.6% | — | 2,213 | 5 | 42 | 1972 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1971 | 85–20 | 81.0% | — | 2,155 | 5 | 49 | 1973 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #120 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1972 | 50–16 | 75.8% | — | 2,016 | 5 | 54 | 1974 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #181 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 1973 | 67–16 | 80.7% | #8 | 2,088 | 5 | 61 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 1974 | 45–10 | 81.8% | #4 | 2,115 | 5 | 67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1975 | 52–13 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,087 | 5 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1976 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #73 | 1,995 | 5 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1977 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,927 | 5 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #216 | 1,917 | 5 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,901 | 5 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |