H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Rodney Harmon vs Jimmy Brown H2H: 0-1

Jimmy Brown holds a 1–0 lead over Rodney Harmon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jimmy Brown leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jimmy Brown won the 1985 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships round of 32 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rodney Harmon
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Jimmy Brown
USA Age 61 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jimmy Brown 6-1 6-0 Rodney Harmon #224 Match data Jul 11, 1985* R32 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rodney Harmon #641 #56 0 1,750 34 42 44.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jimmy Brown — — — 1,772 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rodney Harmon Jimmy Brown
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1980 2–3 40.0% #344 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1981 3–2 60.0% — 1,566 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1982 9–5 64.3% #67 1,718 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1983 9–10 47.4% #61 1,715 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1984 8–15 34.8% #123 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1985 3–7 30.0% #296 1,544 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rodney Harmon Jimmy Brown
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 2 6 8 25.0% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1980 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 4 4 8 50.0% 20 12 32 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1981 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 5 7 12 41.7% 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1982 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 4 3 7 57.1% 19 12 31 61.3% — — — — — — — —
21 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 3 6 9 33.3% 5 11 16 31.3% — — — — — — — —
22 1984 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 3 4 7 42.9% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — —
23 1985 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1988 4 9 13 30.8% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 9 9 18 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 2 5 7 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 19 17 36 52.8% 7 11 18 38.9% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — 38 62 100 38.0% 89 90 179 49.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 12 16 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rodney Harmon Jimmy Brown
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1499 115.1 — — — — — +54 — 47.1% -0.12 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.37
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1578 132.3 — — — — -96 +82 — 42.9% -0.69 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.9 +0.42
18 1980 1516 113.2 — — — — — +33 — 33.3% -1.67 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.04 1983 1723 148.3 — — — — -176 +73 — 58.8% +0.75 4–6 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 96.8 +0.72
19 1981 1566 114.0 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% -0.17 2–0 — — +0.20 1984 1681 136.4 — — — — -87 +72 — 48.0% -0.39 5–8 (38%) 4–5 (44%) 97.4 +0.11
20 1982 1719 134.4 — — — — +29 -130 — 57.1% +0.17 1–1 4–1 (80%) — +0.47 1985 1740 143.2 — — — — -121 +62 — 60.0% +0.82 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 99.2 +1.80
21 1983 1716 127.2 — — — — +36 — -130 45.8% -0.46 2–1 (67%) 5–0 (100%) 105.5 -0.29 1986 1629 121.2 — — — — -34 +69 — 34.5% -1.33 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 97.7 -1.15
22 1984 1591 125.0 — — — — +70 -31 +11 37.1% -0.76 5–4 (56%) 5–6 (45%) 101.4 -0.82 1987 1637 121.9 — — — — -59 +71 — 50.0% -0.17 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.61
23 1985 1545 94.8 — — — — +91 -16 — 26.1% -2.13 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.59 1988 1633 132.6 — — — — -60 +47 — 38.4% -0.64 3–4 (43%) 3–5 (38%) 97.1 -2.01
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1609 125.0 — — — — 0 -7 — 43.4% -0.12 4–7 (36%) 3–5 (38%) 94.3 +1.30
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1519 118.0 — — — — +63 +28 — 26.8% -1.39 1–3 (25%) 1–6 (14%) 93.9 -0.06
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1521 103.2 — — — — +22 +47 — 32.0% -0.68 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.30
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1492 102.0 — — — — +37 — — 25.0% -1.75 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.17
Career — 1750 128.5 — — — — +50 -39 -42 42.2% -0.70 14–6 (70%) 18–9 (67%) 113.5 +0.25 — 1772 138.7 — — — — -48 +62 — 45.7% -0.26 35–50 (41%) 24–43 (36%) 89.5 +0.76

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.