H2H data updated: 2026-08-16 15:14 UTC

Roger Federer vs Denis Gremelmayr H2H: 2-0

Roger Federer holds a 2–0 lead over Denis Gremelmayr in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Roger Federer leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roger Federer won the 2008 Estoril Open semifinal 2-6 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roger Federer
SUI Age 45 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Denis Gremelmayr
GER Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Roger Federer #1 2-6 7-5 6-1 Denis Gremelmayr #104 Match data Apr 19, 2008* SF Estoril Open ATP 250 Clay
Roger Federer #1 6-3 6-2 Denis Gremelmayr #239 Match data Sep 30, 2005* R16 Bangkok ATP 250 Hard

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roger Federer #97 #1 12,315 2,431 1,219 272 81.8% 20 28 6 22 27 103
Denis Gremelmayr #1,512 #59 1,042 1,761 32 57 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roger Federer Denis Gremelmayr
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–3 40.0% #301 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 12–14 46.2% #64 1,663 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 34–29 54.0% #29 1,790 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 46–20 69.7% #13 1,874 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2002 55–22 71.4% #6 1,944 0 4 2002 0–1 0.0% #300 1,484 0 0
21 2003 74–16 82.2% #2 2,103 1 11 — — — — — — —
22 2004 71–6 92.2% #1 2,277 4 22 — — — — — — —
23 2005 80–4 95.2% #1 2,342 6 33 2005 1–3 25.0% #197 1,491 0 0
24 2006 90–5 94.7% #1 2,399 9 45 2006 9–9 50.0% #138 1,611 0 0
25 2007 67–9 88.2% #1 2,327 12 53 2007 0–4 0.0% #119 1,557 0 0
26 2008 66–16 80.5% #2 2,212 13 57 2008 15–20 42.9% #83 1,622 0 0
27 2009 59–12 83.1% #1 2,264 15 61 2009 2–9 18.2% #235 1,555 0 0
28 2010 66–13 83.5% #2 2,311 16 66 — — — — — — —
29 2011 61–12 83.6% #3 2,338 16 70 2011 4–10 28.6% #189 1,586 0 0
30 2012 72–12 85.7% #2 2,339 17 76 2012 1–1 50.0% #538 1,594 0 0
31 2013 45–17 72.6% #6 2,189 17 77 — — — — — — —
32 2014 68–12 85.0% #2 2,354 17 82 — — — — — — —
33 2015 61–11 84.7% #3 2,402 17 88 — — — — — — —
34 2016 21–7 75.0% #16 2,285 17 88 — — — — — — —
35 2017 53–5 91.4% #2 2,387 19 95 — — — — — — —
36 2018 49–10 83.1% #3 2,258 20 99 — — — — — — —
37 2019 53–11 82.8% #3 2,237 20 103 — — — — — — —
38 2020 5–1 83.3% #5 2,237 20 103 — — — — — — —
39 2021 9–5 64.3% #16 2,155 20 103 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Roger Federer Denis Gremelmayr
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1998 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 7 6 13 53.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 24 16 40 60.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 19 9 28 67.9% 9 5 14 64.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 31 11 42 73.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 4 15 73.3% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 43 10 53 81.1% 16 4 20 80.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 45 4 49 91.8% 14 2 16 87.5% 12 0 12 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 50 1 51 98.0% 14 2 16 87.5% 12 0 12 100.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2006 57 2 59 96.6% 16 3 19 84.2% 12 0 12 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 2006 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
25 2007 44 6 50 88.0% 16 3 19 84.2% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2008 34 11 45 75.6% 21 4 25 84.0% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — 2008 7 11 18 38.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 2009 36 10 46 78.3% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2009 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 48 7 55 87.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 45 7 52 86.5% 12 4 16 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2011 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
30 2012 44 8 52 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 15 2 17 88.2% — — — — 2012 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 28 11 39 71.8% 12 5 17 70.6% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 51 8 59 86.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 37 6 43 86.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 8 2 10 80.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 41 4 45 91.1% — — — — 12 1 13 92.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 37 8 45 82.2% — — — — 12 2 14 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 33 7 40 82.5% 9 3 12 75.0% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 770 158 928 83.0% 215 69 284 75.7% 192 29 221 86.9% 42 16 58 72.4% — 16 34 50 32.0% 14 15 29 48.3% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 1,415/1,491 of Roger Federer's and 88/89 of Denis Gremelmayr's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Roger Federer Denis Gremelmayr
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 1998 5/5 4.8 2.8 55.6% 71.3% 52.0% 68.0% 41.3% 62.8% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 22/26 5.4 3.7 58.0% 70.6% 50.7% 55.9% 43.7% 62.1% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 46/63 7.2 3.5 59.1% 72.0% 53.4% 61.8% 43.8% 64.1% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 56/66 8.0 3.1 58.6% 74.0% 52.8% 63.2% 40.8% 65.3% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 66/77 6.7 2.6 60.6% 76.0% 54.5% 64.5% 47.2% 67.6% 39.2% 2002 1/1 1.0 3.0 59.3% 60.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 55.9% 24.5%
21 2003 85/90 7.7 3.0 59.5% 77.4% 58.1% 62.8% 46.8% 69.5% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 74/77 7.6 2.1 62.0% 78.8% 59.2% 71.0% 43.0% 71.3% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 84/84 7.1 1.8 63.3% 76.8% 60.1% 63.0% 48.6% 70.7% 42.8% 2005 4/4 2.0 2.5 59.9% 69.3% 53.2% 47.5% 30.6% 62.3% 38.1%
24 2006 95/95 6.9 1.2 62.8% 77.7% 60.6% 66.4% 47.5% 71.3% 43.0% 2006 18/18 4.0 2.7 56.5% 67.7% 49.9% 49.3% 41.1% 59.8% 38.5%
25 2007 75/76 8.0 1.1 62.0% 77.8% 60.2% 63.1% 42.8% 70.9% 41.4% 2007 4/4 2.0 1.0 59.7% 66.9% 36.9% 50.5% 8.3% 54.3% 27.3%
26 2008 76/82 8.8 0.9 64.7% 77.3% 59.2% 68.9% 44.9% 71.0% 41.2% 2008 34/35 5.2 2.9 57.8% 67.0% 50.1% 60.2% 44.8% 60.0% 34.6%
27 2009 71/71 9.3 1.9 62.6% 79.9% 58.4% 70.4% 44.8% 71.8% 38.7% 2009 11/11 1.9 3.5 56.5% 60.1% 46.1% 48.3% 32.5% 53.7% 33.8%
28 2010 78/79 8.4 1.4 62.0% 79.6% 57.1% 67.9% 46.1% 71.2% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 73/73 6.9 1.3 63.8% 79.4% 59.9% 63.0% 46.1% 72.3% 41.2% 2011 14/14 4.2 2.0 57.7% 64.4% 49.8% 58.3% 36.8% 58.3% 31.6%
30 2012 74/84 8.3 1.6 62.6% 79.2% 61.5% 71.3% 47.3% 72.4% 39.8% 2012 2/2 2.5 1.5 62.5% 67.1% 41.8% 76.7% 25.0% 57.6% 33.3%
31 2013 62/62 6.4 1.7 62.7% 77.1% 57.4% 66.7% 42.8% 69.6% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 78/80 8.0 1.5 63.8% 80.2% 59.1% 74.8% 46.1% 72.4% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 72/72 8.3 1.7 64.2% 81.1% 59.1% 64.0% 42.9% 73.2% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 28/28 8.8 1.8 62.3% 80.2% 56.9% 55.7% 39.5% 71.6% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 57/58 9.6 1.8 62.2% 80.7% 60.5% 64.9% 42.3% 73.1% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 58/59 9.2 1.9 61.8% 81.4% 60.0% 64.9% 46.0% 73.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 61/64 7.5 1.6 64.7% 79.1% 60.9% 70.9% 45.6% 72.7% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 6/6 11.0 2.2 66.8% 74.8% 56.0% 71.6% 39.6% 68.3% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 13/14 8.4 0.8 66.0% 74.0% 57.1% 68.3% 38.5% 68.3% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1,415/1,491 7.9 1.9 62.3% 78.1% 58.5% 66.3% 45.0% 70.7% 40.5% — 88/89 4.0 2.6 57.7% 65.9% 48.9% 55.4% 38.0% 58.6% 34.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Roger Federer Denis Gremelmayr
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
16 1998 1531 124.1 -0.27 +1.46 0.992 49.4% +46 — — 40.0% -0.20 — 1–1 -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 1664 137.6 +0.59 -0.29 0.962 49.3% +54 -178 — 46.2% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 6–7 (46%) -1.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1791 147.8 +1.73 -1.34 0.976 49.9% +29 -256 -255 53.5% +0.23 7–11 (39%) 15–15 (50%) -1.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1874 152.8 +2.77 +1.18 1.104 51.6% +6 -185 -97 62.8% +0.73 16–7 (70%) 24–17 (59%) -1.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1944 157.7 +4.95 +1.81 1.207 53.2% +36 -161 -172 67.4% +1.09 8–10 (44%) 17–11 (61%) +0.05 2002 1484 96.8 -1.63 -3.40 0.556 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — +0.24
21 2003 2104 160.5 +6.67 +5.07 1.392 55.5% +4 -242 -6 75.8% +1.74 14–8 (64%) 25–16 (61%) -0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 2278 170.0 +8.06 +5.97 1.467 56.2% +13 -270 -32 83.5% +2.21 12–3 (80%) 20–5 (80%) -2.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 2343 171.0 +8.25 +6.57 1.459 56.2% +49 -222 +90 86.0% +2.09 15–3 (83%) 28–11 (72%) -0.57 2005 1491 117.1 -1.10 +1.21 1.008 49.1% +33 — — 33.3% -0.78 0–1 0–2 +0.10
24 2006 2400 172.2 +8.93 +6.54 1.498 56.6% +70 -164 +113 84.6% +2.25 18–2 (90%) 37–14 (73%) -0.82 2006 1611 127.1 -0.95 -0.10 0.958 49.2% +7 -29 — 47.8% -0.28 3–2 (60%) 3–3 (50%) -0.72
25 2007 2327 174.3 +8.00 +5.89 1.420 55.4% +70 -34 +244 82.4% +1.89 11–4 (73%) 27–9 (75%) -0.70 2007 1558 109.2 -2.39 -1.40 0.597 41.1% +50 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 -0.37
26 2008 2212 171.1 +7.83 +5.50 1.420 55.4% +57 +138 +349 77.1% +1.70 8–9 (47%) 23–13 (64%) -1.46 2008 1623 129.2 -2.60 -0.92 0.864 47.7% -12 +33 -136 42.0% -0.48 8–5 (62%) 6–6 (50%) -0.92
27 2009 2265 175.1 +8.67 +3.94 1.370 54.6% -23 +154 +390 77.7% +1.60 10–11 (48%) 26–11 (70%) -1.09 2009 1555 105.4 -5.81 -1.62 0.730 44.0% -4 +50 — 19.2% -2.42 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) +0.12
28 2010 2311 176.3 +8.19 +5.25 1.418 55.4% +74 +19 +260 77.9% +1.71 11–6 (65%) 21–10 (68%) -1.27 2010 1512 92.7 — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 2339 179.2 +9.63 +5.23 1.485 56.2% +64 +28 +205 79.3% +1.80 6–6 (50%) 19–9 (68%) -1.04 2011 1587 111.1 -2.91 -3.57 0.758 45.1% -47 +77 -109 29.0% -1.68 2–1 (67%) 4–2 (67%) -0.02
30 2012 2339 177.8 +9.37 +4.25 1.443 55.4% +40 +42 +234 77.1% +1.76 14–4 (78%) 21–14 (60%) -1.99 2012 1594 122.7 +1.57 +2.03 0.784 48.7% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — -0.26
31 2013 2190 175.5 +6.19 +4.70 1.339 54.7% +89 +80 +315 68.1% +1.26 13–8 (62%) 15–10 (60%) -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 2354 179.1 +8.51 +5.80 1.484 55.8% +50 -127 +146 77.1% +1.71 17–7 (71%) 24–15 (62%) -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 2402 182.0 +9.20 +6.49 1.539 56.3% +68 -139 +144 79.2% +1.90 9–4 (69%) 17–13 (57%) -2.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 2286 158.0 +6.68 +3.70 1.395 54.6% +156 -86 +161 73.4% +1.43 3–4 (43%) 9–5 (64%) -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 2387 178.6 +8.73 +5.24 1.507 55.6% +55 — +46 80.4% +1.83 13–3 (81%) 21–9 (70%) -1.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 2259 172.5 +8.65 +3.59 1.461 55.1% +62 — +145 76.7% +1.56 11–5 (69%) 18–12 (60%) +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 2238 175.4 +8.09 +5.05 1.469 55.6% +3 +3 +218 77.6% +1.73 7–5 (58%) 19–6 (76%) -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 2238 141.5 +2.80 +1.39 1.278 54.4% -15 — — 65.2% +1.17 2–0 3–1 (75%) -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 2155 128.0 +2.89 -0.44 1.094 51.1% — +101 +259 65.8% +0.50 1–3 (25%) 6–2 (75%) +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2432 176.3 +7.47 +4.63 1.383 55.0% +44 -66 +131 75.7% +1.60 231–127 (65%) 442–236 (65%) -1.47 — 1761 123.4 -2.53 -1.15 0.834 46.9% -3 +25 -118 36.4% -0.99 14–11 (56%) 16–15 (52%) -2.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.