H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Roger Federer vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 3-2

Roger Federer holds a 3–2 lead over Ernests Gulbis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Ernests Gulbis leads 2–1 on clay, while Roger Federer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Roger Federer won the 2015 Halle fourth round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roger Federer
SUI Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Ernests Gulbis
LAT Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 19, 2015* Halle ATP 500 R16 Grass Roger Federer #2 6-3 7-5 Ernests Gulbis #86 Match data
Jun 3, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Ernests Gulbis #17 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-2 4-6 6-3 Roger Federer #4 Match data
May 15, 2010* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Roger Federer #1 3-6 6-1 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #34 Match data
Apr 28, 2010* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Ernests Gulbis #40 2-6 6-1 7-5 Roger Federer #1 Match data
Jan 8, 2010* Doha ATP 250 QF Hard Roger Federer #1 6-2 4-6 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #90 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roger Federer #97 #1 12,315 2,430 1,206 267 81.9% 20 28 6 22 27 103
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,139 221 232 48.8% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roger Federer Ernests Gulbis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–3 40.0% #301 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 12–14 46.2% #64 1,663 0 0 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0
18 2000 30–27 52.6% #29 1,771 0 0 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0
19 2001 46–20 69.7% #13 1,874 0 1 2008 22–20 52.4% #53 1,815 0 0
20 2002 55–22 71.4% #6 1,944 0 4 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,696 0 0
21 2003 74–16 82.2% #2 2,104 1 11 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,845 0 1
22 2004 70–5 93.3% #1 2,301 4 22 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,774 0 2
23 2005 80–4 95.2% #1 2,348 6 33 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,727 0 2
24 2006 90–5 94.7% #1 2,401 9 45 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,939 0 4
25 2007 67–9 88.2% #1 2,330 12 53 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,917 0 6
26 2008 63–15 80.8% #2 2,198 13 57 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6
27 2009 59–12 83.1% #1 2,259 15 61 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6
28 2010 66–13 83.5% #2 2,311 16 66 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,716 0 6
29 2011 61–12 83.6% #3 2,340 16 70 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,813 0 6
30 2012 67–11 85.9% #2 2,347 17 76 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,533 0 6
31 2013 45–17 72.6% #6 2,189 17 77 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,562 0 6
32 2014 68–12 85.0% #2 2,343 17 82 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6
33 2015 61–11 84.7% #3 2,398 17 88 — — — — — — —
34 2016 21–7 75.0% #16 2,283 17 88 — — — — — — —
35 2017 53–5 91.4% #2 2,385 19 95 — — — — — — —
36 2018 49–10 83.1% #3 2,261 20 99 — — — — — — —
37 2019 53–11 82.8% #3 2,240 20 103 — — — — — — —
38 2020 5–1 83.3% #5 2,240 20 103 — — — — — — —
39 2021 9–5 64.3% #16 2,128 20 103 — — — — — — —