H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Roger Federer vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 7-0

Roger Federer holds a 7–0 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Roger Federer leads 5–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Roger Federer won the 2019 Dubai fourth round 6-3 3-6 6-3.

SUI Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
7 0
7 main draw meetings
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 28, 2019* Dubai ATP 500 R16 Hard Roger Federer #7 6-3 3-6 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #32 Match data
Feb 26, 2015* Dubai ATP 500 R16 Hard Roger Federer #2 6-4 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #31 Match data
Sep 2, 2012* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Roger Federer #1 6-3 6-4 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #26 Match data
Nov 22, 2009 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Hard Roger Federer #1 4-6 7-5 6-1 Fernando Verdasco #8 Match data
Mar 20, 2009* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Roger Federer #2 6-3 7-6(5) Fernando Verdasco #10 Match data
May 17, 2008* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Roger Federer #1 6-3 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #28 Match data
May 11, 2005* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Roger Federer #1 6-4 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #48 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roger Federer #97 #1 12,315 2,430 1,206 267 81.9% 20 28 6 22 27 103
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roger Federer Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–3 40.0% #301 1,530 0 0
17 1999 12–14 46.2% #64 1,663 0 0
18 2000 30–27 52.6% #29 1,771 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 2001 46–20 69.7% #13 1,874 0 1 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 2002 55–22 71.4% #6 1,944 0 4 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 2003 74–16 82.2% #2 2,104 1 11 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2004 70–5 93.3% #1 2,301 4 22 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2005 80–4 95.2% #1 2,348 6 33 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2006 90–5 94.7% #1 2,401 9 45 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2007 67–9 88.2% #1 2,330 12 53 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2008 63–15 80.8% #2 2,198 13 57 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2009 59–12 83.1% #1 2,259 15 61 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2010 66–13 83.5% #2 2,311 16 66 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2011 61–12 83.6% #3 2,340 16 70 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2012 67–11 85.9% #2 2,347 17 76 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 2013 45–17 72.6% #6 2,189 17 77 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2014 68–12 85.0% #2 2,343 17 82 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 2015 61–11 84.7% #3 2,398 17 88 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 2016 21–7 75.0% #16 2,283 17 88 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 2017 53–5 91.4% #2 2,385 19 95 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 2018 49–10 83.1% #3 2,261 20 99 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 2019 53–11 82.8% #3 2,240 20 103 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 2020 5–1 83.3% #5 2,240 20 103 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 2021 9–5 64.3% #16 2,128 20 103 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7