H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Roger Federer vs Guillermo Canas H2H: 3-3

Roger Federer and Guillermo Canas are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Canas leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Roger Federer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Roger Federer won the 2008 Rome Masters third round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roger Federer
SUI Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Guillermo Canas
ARG Age 48 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 8, 2008* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Roger Federer #1 6-3 6-3 Guillermo Canas #30 Match data
Oct 19, 2007* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Roger Federer #1 6-0 6-3 Guillermo Canas #14 Match data
Mar 27, 2007* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Guillermo Canas #55 7-6(2) 2-6 7-6(5) Roger Federer #1 Match data
Mar 8, 2007* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Guillermo Canas #60 7-5 6-2 Roger Federer #1 Match data
Mar 13, 2005* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Roger Federer #1 6-3 6-1 Guillermo Canas #14 Match data
Jul 31, 2002* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Guillermo Canas #19 7-6(10) 7-5 Roger Federer #10 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roger Federer #97 #1 12,315 2,430 1,206 267 81.9% 20 28 6 22 27 103
Guillermo Canas #1,110 #8 2,075 2,008 244 188 56.5% 0 1 0 0 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roger Federer Guillermo Canas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–3 40.0% #301 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 12–14 46.2% #64 1,663 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 30–27 52.6% #29 1,771 0 0 1996 0–3 0.0% #183 1,462 0 0
19 2001 46–20 69.7% #13 1,874 0 1 1997 1–4 20.0% #129 1,461 0 0
20 2002 55–22 71.4% #6 1,944 0 4 1998 6–14 30.0% #95 1,481 0 0
21 2003 74–16 82.2% #2 2,104 1 11 1999 15–23 39.5% #71 1,575 0 0
22 2004 70–5 93.3% #1 2,301 4 22 2000 5–12 29.4% #231 1,530 0 0
23 2005 80–4 95.2% #1 2,348 6 33 2001 45–21 68.2% #15 1,840 0 1
24 2006 90–5 94.7% #1 2,401 9 45 2002 41–22 65.1% #15 1,857 0 3
25 2007 67–9 88.2% #1 2,330 12 53 2003 5–4 55.6% #272 1,805 0 3
26 2008 63–15 80.8% #2 2,198 13 57 2004 40–21 65.6% #12 1,898 0 6
27 2009 59–12 83.1% #1 2,259 15 61 2005 22–11 66.7% #102 1,889 0 6
28 2010 66–13 83.5% #2 2,311 16 66 — — — — — — —
29 2011 61–12 83.6% #3 2,340 16 70 2007 38–21 64.4% #15 1,821 0 7
30 2012 67–11 85.9% #2 2,347 17 76 2008 21–19 52.5% #79 1,690 0 7
31 2013 45–17 72.6% #6 2,189 17 77 2009 5–13 27.8% #191 1,628 0 7
32 2014 68–12 85.0% #2 2,343 17 82 — — — — — — —
33 2015 61–11 84.7% #3 2,398 17 88 — — — — — — —
34 2016 21–7 75.0% #16 2,283 17 88 — — — — — — —
35 2017 53–5 91.4% #2 2,385 19 95 — — — — — — —
36 2018 49–10 83.1% #3 2,261 20 99 — — — — — — —
37 2019 53–11 82.8% #3 2,240 20 103 — — — — — — —
38 2020 5–1 83.3% #5 2,240 20 103 — — — — — — —
39 2021 9–5 64.3% #16 2,128 20 103 — — — — — — —