H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Roger Federer vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 4-0

Roger Federer holds a 4–0 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Roger Federer leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Roger Federer won the 2016 Monte Carlo Masters third round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roger Federer
SUI Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 13, 2016* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Roger Federer #3 6-3 6-4 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #38 Match data
Jun 25, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Roger Federer #2 6-2 6-2 6-4 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #42 Match data
Mar 16, 2008* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Roger Federer #1 6-3 6-2 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #62 Match data
Oct 27, 2006* Basel ATP 250 R16 Carpet Roger Federer #1 6-2 6-0 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #75 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roger Federer #97 #1 12,315 2,430 1,206 267 81.9% 20 28 6 22 27 103
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,938 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roger Federer Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–3 40.0% #301 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 12–14 46.2% #64 1,663 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 30–27 52.6% #29 1,771 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 46–20 69.7% #13 1,874 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2002 55–22 71.4% #6 1,944 0 4 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 2003 74–16 82.2% #2 2,104 1 11 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 2004 70–5 93.3% #1 2,301 4 22 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0
23 2005 80–4 95.2% #1 2,348 6 33 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,595 0 0
24 2006 90–5 94.7% #1 2,401 9 45 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,526 0 0
25 2007 67–9 88.2% #1 2,330 12 53 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,646 0 0
26 2008 63–15 80.8% #2 2,198 13 57 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,757 0 1
27 2009 59–12 83.1% #1 2,259 15 61 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,874 0 2
28 2010 66–13 83.5% #2 2,311 16 66 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 2011 61–12 83.6% #3 2,340 16 70 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,719 0 2
30 2012 67–11 85.9% #2 2,347 17 76 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 2013 45–17 72.6% #6 2,189 17 77 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,740 0 3
32 2014 68–12 85.0% #2 2,343 17 82 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,853 0 5
33 2015 61–11 84.7% #3 2,398 17 88 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,686 0 5
34 2016 21–7 75.0% #16 2,283 17 88 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,747 0 5
35 2017 53–5 91.4% #2 2,385 19 95 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,675 0 5
36 2018 49–10 83.1% #3 2,261 20 99 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,694 0 5
37 2019 53–11 82.8% #3 2,240 20 103 — — — — — — —
38 2020 5–1 83.3% #5 2,240 20 103 — — — — — — —
39 2021 9–5 64.3% #16 2,128 20 103 — — — — — — —