H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Roger Federer vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 3-1

Roger Federer holds a 3–1 lead over Hicham Arazi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Roger Federer leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roger Federer won the 2004 Canada Masters second round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roger Federer
SUI Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Hicham Arazi
MAR Age 52 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 28, 2004* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Roger Federer #1 6-3 7-5 Hicham Arazi #36 Match data
Mar 1, 2003* Dubai ATP 250 QF Hard Roger Federer #5 7-5 6-3 Hicham Arazi #113 Match data
Jul 11, 2002* Gstaad ATP 250 R32 Clay Roger Federer #11 6-4 6-3 Hicham Arazi #46 Match data
May 29, 2002* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Hicham Arazi #45 6-3 6-2 6-4 Roger Federer #8 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roger Federer #97 #1 12,315 2,430 1,206 267 81.9% 20 28 6 22 27 103
Hicham Arazi #793 #22 1,240 1,864 202 213 48.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roger Federer Hicham Arazi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–3 40.0% #301 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 12–14 46.2% #64 1,663 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 30–27 52.6% #29 1,771 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 46–20 69.7% #13 1,874 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2002 55–22 71.4% #6 1,944 0 4 1994 0–1 0.0% #184 1,486 0 0
21 2003 74–16 82.2% #2 2,104 1 11 1995 1–5 16.7% #141 1,457 0 0
22 2004 70–5 93.3% #1 2,301 4 22 1996 12–16 42.9% #79 1,550 0 0
23 2005 80–4 95.2% #1 2,348 6 33 1997 28–27 50.9% #38 1,624 0 1
24 2006 90–5 94.7% #1 2,401 9 45 1998 23–28 45.1% #36 1,714 0 1
25 2007 67–9 88.2% #1 2,330 12 53 1999 27–27 50.0% #36 1,702 0 1
26 2008 63–15 80.8% #2 2,198 13 57 2000 31–26 54.4% #30 1,775 0 1
27 2009 59–12 83.1% #1 2,259 15 61 2001 30–23 56.6% #25 1,833 0 1
28 2010 66–13 83.5% #2 2,311 16 66 2002 14–21 40.0% #90 1,699 0 1
29 2011 61–12 83.6% #3 2,340 16 70 2003 21–20 51.2% #52 1,718 0 1
30 2012 67–11 85.9% #2 2,347 17 76 2004 15–17 46.9% #62 1,711 0 1
31 2013 45–17 72.6% #6 2,189 17 77 2005 0–2 0.0% #897 1,672 0 1
32 2014 68–12 85.0% #2 2,343 17 82 — — — — — — —
33 2015 61–11 84.7% #3 2,398 17 88 — — — — — — —
34 2016 21–7 75.0% #16 2,283 17 88 — — — — — — —
35 2017 53–5 91.4% #2 2,385 19 95 — — — — — — —
36 2018 49–10 83.1% #3 2,261 20 99 — — — — — — —
37 2019 53–11 82.8% #3 2,240 20 103 — — — — — — —
38 2020 5–1 83.3% #5 2,240 20 103 — — — — — — —
39 2021 9–5 64.3% #16 2,128 20 103 — — — — — — —