H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Roger Federer vs Ivan Ljubicic H2H: 13-3
Roger Federer holds a 13–3 lead over Ivan Ljubicic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 16 main-draw meetings, Roger Federer leads 12–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Roger Federer won the 2010 Stockholm semifinal 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
13
–
3
16 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2010* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Roger Federer | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Mar 20, 2008* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-3 6-4 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Nov 13, 2006 | Masters Cup | ATP Finals | RR | Hard | Roger Federer | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Mar 27, 2006* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | F | Hard | Roger Federer | 7-6(5) 7-6(4) 7-6(6) | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Mar 12, 2006* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-2 6-3 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Nov 14, 2005 | Masters Cup | ATP Finals | RR | Carpet | Roger Federer | 6-3 2-6 7-6(4) | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Mar 12, 2005* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Roger Federer | 7-6(3) 7-6(4) | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Feb 27, 2005* | Dubai | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-1 6-7(6) 6-3 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Feb 20, 2005* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Roger Federer | 5-7 7-5 7-6(5) | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Jan 9, 2005* | Doha | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-3 6-1 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Oct 24, 2003* | Basel | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Ivan Ljubicic | 7-6(5) 6-7(5) 6-4 | Roger Federer | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2003* | Dubai | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-3 6-2 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Feb 13, 2003* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Roger Federer | 7-6(3) (ret.) | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Aug 7, 2002* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ivan Ljubicic | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | Roger Federer | Match data |
| Jul 12, 2001* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ivan Ljubicic | 6-2 6-1 | Roger Federer | Match data |
| Feb 12, 2000* | Marseille | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-2 3-6 7-6(5) | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Federer | #97 | #1 | 12,315 | 2,430 | 1,206 | 267 | 81.9% | 20 | 28 | 6 | 22 | 27 | 103 |
| Ivan Ljubicic | #53 | #3 | 3,315 | 2,052 | 400 | 282 | 58.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roger Federer | Ivan Ljubicic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #301 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1999 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #29 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #289 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #13 | 1,874 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 55–22 | 71.4% | #6 | 1,944 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 74–16 | 82.2% | #2 | 2,104 | 1 | 11 | 2000 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #91 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 70–5 | 93.3% | #1 | 2,301 | 4 | 22 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2005 | 80–4 | 95.2% | #1 | 2,348 | 6 | 33 | 2002 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 90–5 | 94.7% | #1 | 2,401 | 9 | 45 | 2003 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2007 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #1 | 2,330 | 12 | 53 | 2004 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2008 | 63–15 | 80.8% | #2 | 2,198 | 13 | 57 | 2005 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #9 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2009 | 59–12 | 83.1% | #1 | 2,259 | 15 | 61 | 2006 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 1,944 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2010 | 66–13 | 83.5% | #2 | 2,311 | 16 | 66 | 2007 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #18 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2011 | 61–12 | 83.6% | #3 | 2,340 | 16 | 70 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,724 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2012 | 67–11 | 85.9% | #2 | 2,347 | 17 | 76 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 2013 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #6 | 2,189 | 17 | 77 | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #17 | 1,884 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 2014 | 68–12 | 85.0% | #2 | 2,343 | 17 | 82 | 2011 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #30 | 1,909 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | 2015 | 61–11 | 84.7% | #3 | 2,398 | 17 | 88 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | 2016 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #16 | 2,283 | 17 | 88 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 53–5 | 91.4% | #2 | 2,385 | 19 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 49–10 | 83.1% | #3 | 2,261 | 20 | 99 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 53–11 | 82.8% | #3 | 2,240 | 20 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2020 | 5–1 | 83.3% | #5 | 2,240 | 20 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2021 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #16 | 2,128 | 20 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |