H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Roger Federer vs Jan Siemerink H2H: 0-1

Jan Siemerink holds a 1–0 lead over Roger Federer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan Siemerink leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan Siemerink won the 1998 Toulouse quarterfinal 7-6(5) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roger Federer
SUI Age 45 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Jan Siemerink
NED Age 56 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jan Siemerink #20 7-6(5) 6-2 Roger Federer #878 Match data Oct 3, 1998* QF Toulouse ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Roger Federer #97 #1 12,315 2,432 1,219 272 81.8% 20 28 6 24 25 103
Jan Siemerink #987 #14 1,863 1,902 261 262 49.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roger Federer Jan Siemerink
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–3 40.0% #301 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 12–14 46.2% #64 1,663 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 34–29 54.0% #29 1,790 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 46–20 69.7% #13 1,874 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2002 55–22 71.4% #6 1,944 0 4 1990 5–4 55.6% #135 1,541 0 0
21 2003 74–16 82.2% #2 2,103 1 11 1991 30–21 58.8% #26 1,756 0 1
22 2004 71–6 92.2% #1 2,277 4 22 1992 22–27 44.9% #57 1,741 0 1
23 2005 80–4 95.2% #1 2,342 6 33 1993 24–25 49.0% #53 1,669 0 1
24 2006 90–5 94.7% #1 2,399 9 45 1994 16–19 45.7% #81 1,686 0 1
25 2007 67–9 88.2% #1 2,327 12 53 1995 37–29 56.1% #21 1,768 0 1
26 2008 66–16 80.5% #2 2,212 13 57 1996 35–28 55.6% #15 1,861 0 2
27 2009 59–12 83.1% #1 2,264 15 61 1997 18–27 40.0% #78 1,738 0 2
28 2010 66–13 83.5% #2 2,311 16 66 1998 38–24 61.3% #19 1,809 0 4
29 2011 61–12 83.6% #3 2,338 16 70 1999 17–25 40.5% #88 1,653 0 4
30 2012 72–12 85.7% #2 2,339 17 76 2000 7–14 33.3% #104 1,573 0 4
31 2013 45–17 72.6% #6 2,189 17 77 2001 12–17 41.4% #127 1,563 0 4
32 2014 68–12 85.0% #2 2,354 17 82 2002 0–2 0.0% #438 1,531 0 4
33 2015 61–11 84.7% #3 2,402 17 88 — — — — — — —
34 2016 21–7 75.0% #16 2,285 17 88 — — — — — — —
35 2017 53–5 91.4% #2 2,387 19 95 — — — — — — —
36 2018 49–10 83.1% #3 2,259 20 99 — — — — — — —
37 2019 53–11 82.8% #3 2,238 20 103 — — — — — — —
38 2020 5–1 83.3% #5 2,238 20 103 — — — — — — —
39 2021 9–5 64.3% #16 2,155 20 103 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Roger Federer Jan Siemerink
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1998 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 7 6 13 53.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 24 16 40 60.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 19 9 28 67.9% 9 5 14 64.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 31 11 42 73.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 4 15 73.3% 1990 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2003 43 10 53 81.1% 16 4 20 80.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1991 16 7 23 69.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 7 20 65.0%
22 2004 45 4 49 91.8% 14 2 16 87.5% 12 0 12 100.0% — — — — 1992 10 12 22 45.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 7 16 56.3%
23 2005 50 1 51 98.0% 14 2 16 87.5% 12 0 12 100.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1993 11 13 24 45.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5%
24 2006 57 2 59 96.6% 16 3 19 84.2% 12 0 12 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 1994 9 11 20 45.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0%
25 2007 44 6 50 88.0% 16 3 19 84.2% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 1995 20 12 32 62.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
26 2008 34 11 45 75.6% 21 4 25 84.0% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — 1996 14 14 28 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 12 8 20 60.0%
27 2009 36 10 46 78.3% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 1997 10 12 22 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
28 2010 48 7 55 87.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 1998 18 11 29 62.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 12 6 18 66.7%
29 2011 45 7 52 86.5% 12 4 16 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 1999 10 12 22 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
30 2012 44 8 52 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 15 2 17 88.2% — — — — 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
31 2013 28 11 39 71.8% 12 5 17 70.6% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 2001 6 6 12 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
32 2014 51 8 59 86.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2015 37 6 43 86.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 8 2 10 80.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 41 4 45 91.1% — — — — 12 1 13 92.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 37 8 45 82.2% — — — — 12 2 14 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 33 7 40 82.5% 9 3 12 75.0% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 770 158 928 83.0% 215 69 284 75.7% 192 29 221 86.9% 42 16 58 72.4% — 129 121 250 51.6% 29 50 79 36.7% 28 30 58 48.3% 75 61 136 55.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 1,415/1,491 of Roger Federer's and 448/514 of Jan Siemerink's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Roger Federer Jan Siemerink
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 1998 5/5 4.8 2.8 55.6% 71.3% 52.0% 68.0% 41.3% 62.8% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 22/26 5.4 3.7 58.0% 70.6% 50.7% 55.9% 43.7% 62.1% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 46/63 7.2 3.5 59.1% 72.0% 53.4% 61.8% 43.8% 64.1% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 56/66 8.0 3.1 58.6% 74.0% 52.8% 63.2% 40.8% 65.3% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 66/77 6.7 2.6 60.6% 76.0% 54.5% 64.5% 47.2% 67.6% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 85/90 7.7 3.0 59.5% 77.4% 58.1% 62.8% 46.8% 69.5% 42.5% 1991 48/51 7.0 5.1 52.3% 75.3% 53.3% 58.8% 44.6% 64.8% 37.8%
22 2004 74/77 7.6 2.1 62.0% 78.8% 59.2% 71.0% 43.0% 71.3% 42.1% 1992 42/49 6.2 4.2 54.6% 72.8% 50.4% 63.1% 36.0% 62.7% 34.7%
23 2005 84/84 7.1 1.8 63.3% 76.8% 60.1% 63.0% 48.6% 70.7% 42.8% 1993 41/49 6.4 4.0 56.6% 76.6% 50.8% 62.6% 44.2% 65.2% 35.5%
24 2006 95/95 6.9 1.2 62.8% 77.7% 60.6% 66.4% 47.5% 71.3% 43.0% 1994 34/35 6.1 4.0 60.1% 75.5% 50.2% 63.0% 40.6% 65.5% 36.4%
25 2007 75/76 8.0 1.1 62.0% 77.8% 60.2% 63.1% 42.8% 70.9% 41.4% 1995 61/66 5.4 3.4 59.5% 73.7% 53.2% 64.8% 37.0% 65.3% 35.9%
26 2008 76/82 8.8 0.9 64.7% 77.3% 59.2% 68.9% 44.9% 71.0% 41.2% 1996 61/63 6.5 5.1 55.7% 75.7% 51.2% 65.5% 39.7% 64.8% 35.9%
27 2009 71/71 9.3 1.9 62.6% 79.9% 58.4% 70.4% 44.8% 71.8% 38.7% 1997 38/45 7.7 5.0 56.5% 74.2% 52.0% 66.9% 45.4% 64.4% 35.1%
28 2010 78/79 8.4 1.4 62.0% 79.6% 57.1% 67.9% 46.1% 71.2% 40.9% 1998 48/62 8.3 4.6 58.0% 77.7% 52.2% 65.2% 43.2% 66.9% 34.3%
29 2011 73/73 6.9 1.3 63.8% 79.4% 59.9% 63.0% 46.1% 72.3% 41.2% 1999 30/42 5.9 5.1 55.5% 73.7% 50.1% 56.9% 38.4% 63.1% 32.6%
30 2012 74/84 8.3 1.6 62.6% 79.2% 61.5% 71.3% 47.3% 72.4% 39.8% 2000 17/21 6.5 5.8 54.9% 73.6% 46.0% 64.2% 28.0% 61.4% 33.6%
31 2013 62/62 6.4 1.7 62.7% 77.1% 57.4% 66.7% 42.8% 69.6% 40.8% 2001 26/29 7.2 5.9 52.8% 75.6% 48.7% 56.6% 34.2% 62.7% 32.1%
32 2014 78/80 8.0 1.5 63.8% 80.2% 59.1% 74.8% 46.1% 72.4% 40.9% 2002 2/2 7.0 6.0 54.2% 76.2% 50.9% 42.9% 50.0% 64.8% 27.2%
33 2015 72/72 8.3 1.7 64.2% 81.1% 59.1% 64.0% 42.9% 73.2% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 28/28 8.8 1.8 62.3% 80.2% 56.9% 55.7% 39.5% 71.6% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 57/58 9.6 1.8 62.2% 80.7% 60.5% 64.9% 42.3% 73.1% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 58/59 9.2 1.9 61.8% 81.4% 60.0% 64.9% 46.0% 73.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 61/64 7.5 1.6 64.7% 79.1% 60.9% 70.9% 45.6% 72.7% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 6/6 11.0 2.2 66.8% 74.8% 56.0% 71.6% 39.6% 68.3% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 13/14 8.4 0.8 66.0% 74.0% 57.1% 68.3% 38.5% 68.3% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1,415/1,491 7.9 1.9 62.3% 78.1% 58.5% 66.3% 45.0% 70.7% 40.5% — 448/523 6.6 4.6 56.3% 75.1% 51.3% 62.8% 40.0% 64.6% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Roger Federer Jan Siemerink
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1998 1531 124.1 -0.27 +1.46 0.992 49.4% +46 — — 40.0% -0.20 — 1–1 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 1664 137.6 +0.59 -0.29 0.962 49.3% +54 -178 — 46.2% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1791 147.8 +1.73 -1.34 0.976 49.9% +29 -256 -255 53.5% +0.23 7–11 (39%) 15–15 (50%) — -1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1874 152.8 +2.77 +1.18 1.104 51.6% +6 -185 -97 62.8% +0.73 16–7 (70%) 24–17 (59%) — -0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1944 157.7 +4.95 +1.81 1.207 53.2% +36 -161 -172 67.4% +1.09 8–10 (44%) 17–11 (61%) — +0.25 1990 1541 108.1 — — — — +36 — — 52.6% -0.05 1–0 — — +1.03
21 2003 2104 160.5 +6.67 +5.07 1.392 55.5% +4 -242 -6 75.8% +1.74 14–8 (64%) 25–16 (61%) — -0.34 1991 1757 143.1 +3.22 -0.58 1.074 51.5% +40 -248 -209 55.7% +0.44 11–10 (52%) 14–13 (52%) — -0.39
22 2004 2278 170.0 +8.06 +5.97 1.467 56.2% +13 -270 -32 83.5% +2.21 12–3 (80%) 20–5 (80%) — -2.04 1992 1741 139.7 +1.78 -2.28 0.929 49.2% +31 -264 -201 43.8% -0.47 7–7 (50%) 10–6 (63%) — -2.48
23 2005 2343 171.0 +8.25 +6.57 1.459 56.2% +49 -222 +90 86.0% +2.09 15–3 (83%) 28–11 (72%) — -0.43 1993 1669 136.6 +2.63 -1.58 1.020 50.4% +20 -120 -143 50.0% +0.11 8–11 (42%) 13–14 (48%) — +0.60
24 2006 2400 172.2 +8.93 +6.54 1.498 56.6% +70 -164 +113 84.6% +2.25 18–2 (90%) 37–14 (73%) — -0.72 1994 1686 139.2 +3.09 -0.26 1.054 50.9% -6 -131 — 48.8% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.29
25 2007 2327 174.3 +8.00 +5.89 1.420 55.4% +70 -34 +244 82.4% +1.89 11–4 (73%) 27–9 (75%) — -0.78 1995 1768 149.5 +3.33 -1.32 1.035 50.6% -12 -116 -191 54.4% +0.22 11–8 (58%) 12–7 (63%) — -2.79
26 2008 2212 171.1 +7.83 +5.50 1.420 55.4% +57 +138 +349 77.1% +1.70 8–9 (47%) 23–13 (64%) — -1.55 1996 1862 148.8 +2.53 -0.73 1.019 50.6% -13 -212 -147 54.0% +0.10 11–10 (52%) 30–16 (65%) — -1.35
27 2009 2265 175.1 +8.67 +3.94 1.370 54.6% -22 +153 +391 77.7% +1.60 10–11 (48%) 26–11 (70%) — -1.08 1997 1739 137.7 +1.77 -1.30 0.987 50.2% +24 -75 -78 43.8% -0.28 7–12 (37%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.14
28 2010 2311 176.3 +8.19 +5.25 1.418 55.4% +74 +19 +260 77.9% +1.71 11–6 (65%) 21–10 (68%) — -1.35 1998 1810 145.1 +3.80 -2.09 1.038 50.9% +13 -234 -13 57.3% +0.46 15–7 (68%) 14–16 (47%) — -0.24
29 2011 2339 179.2 +9.63 +5.23 1.485 56.2% +64 +28 +206 79.3% +1.80 6–6 (50%) 19–9 (68%) — -1.12 1999 1654 132.5 +1.25 -2.98 0.884 48.1% +56 -141 +72 42.6% -0.49 6–7 (46%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.21
30 2012 2339 177.8 +9.37 +4.25 1.443 55.4% +40 +42 +234 77.1% +1.76 14–4 (78%) 21–14 (60%) — -2.11 2000 1573 115.4 -0.13 -3.10 0.870 47.9% +66 -41 +96 37.0% -0.83 3–5 (38%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.50
31 2013 2189 175.5 +6.21 +4.69 1.339 54.7% +90 +81 +316 68.1% +1.26 13–8 (62%) 15–10 (60%) — -0.39 2001 1564 122.8 +0.45 -4.28 0.859 47.7% +102 -52 +33 38.7% -0.73 6–4 (60%) 6–11 (35%) — -0.11
32 2014 2354 179.1 +8.51 +5.79 1.484 55.8% +49 -129 +147 77.1% +1.71 17–7 (71%) 24–15 (62%) — -0.07 2002 1531 102.5 -1.57 -0.36 0.773 46.8% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.01
33 2015 2402 182.0 +9.20 +6.49 1.539 56.3% +67 -142 +145 79.2% +1.90 9–4 (69%) 17–13 (57%) — -2.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 2286 158.1 +6.68 +3.70 1.395 54.6% +156 -88 +162 73.4% +1.43 3–4 (43%) 9–5 (64%) — -0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 2388 178.6 +8.73 +5.24 1.507 55.6% +54 — +46 80.4% +1.83 13–3 (81%) 21–9 (70%) — -1.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 2259 172.5 +8.65 +3.59 1.461 55.1% +62 — +144 76.7% +1.56 11–5 (69%) 18–12 (60%) — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 2238 175.5 +8.09 +5.05 1.469 55.6% +3 +2 +219 77.6% +1.73 7–5 (58%) 19–6 (76%) — -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 2238 141.5 +2.80 +1.39 1.278 54.4% -14 — — 65.2% +1.17 2–0 3–1 (75%) — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 2156 128.1 +2.89 -0.44 1.094 51.1% — +100 +258 65.8% +0.50 1–3 (25%) 6–2 (75%) — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2432 176.3 +7.47 +4.63 1.383 55.0% +44 -66 +132 75.7% +1.60 231–127 (65%) 442–236 (65%) 102.7 -1.39 — 1902 144.8 +2.44 -1.62 0.993 50.1% +20 -133 -71 49.5% -0.03 89–89 (50%) 131–118 (53%) 104.4 -1.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.