H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Roger Federer vs Janko Tipsarevic H2H: 5-0

Roger Federer holds a 5–0 lead over Janko Tipsarevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Roger Federer leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Roger Federer won the 2012 Tour Finals round-robin match 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roger Federer
SUI Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Janko Tipsarevic
SRB Age 42 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 5, 2012 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Hard Roger Federer #2 6-3 6-1 Janko Tipsarevic #9 Match data
May 12, 2012* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 SF Clay Roger Federer #3 6-2 6-3 Janko Tipsarevic #8 Match data
May 28, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Roger Federer #3 6-1 6-4 6-3 Janko Tipsarevic #32 Match data
Nov 5, 2010* Basel ATP 500 R16 Hard Roger Federer #2 6-3 6-4 Janko Tipsarevic #46 Match data
Jan 20, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Roger Federer #1 6-7(5) 7-6(1) 5-7 6-1 10-8 Janko Tipsarevic #49 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roger Federer #97 #1 12,315 2,430 1,206 267 81.9% 20 28 6 22 27 103
Janko Tipsarevic #755 #8 3,320 2,072 245 240 50.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roger Federer Janko Tipsarevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–3 40.0% #301 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 12–14 46.2% #64 1,663 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 30–27 52.6% #29 1,771 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 46–20 69.7% #13 1,874 0 1 2003 1–2 33.3% #161 1,565 0 0
20 2002 55–22 71.4% #6 1,944 0 4 2004 2–7 22.2% #117 1,551 0 0
21 2003 74–16 82.2% #2 2,104 1 11 2005 7–15 31.8% #139 1,543 0 0
22 2004 70–5 93.3% #1 2,301 4 22 2006 8–17 32.0% #64 1,556 0 0
23 2005 80–4 95.2% #1 2,348 6 33 2007 17–21 44.7% #52 1,735 0 0
24 2006 90–5 94.7% #1 2,401 9 45 2008 24–21 53.3% #49 1,727 0 0
25 2007 67–9 88.2% #1 2,330 12 53 2009 26–23 53.1% #38 1,818 0 0
26 2008 63–15 80.8% #2 2,198 13 57 2010 22–22 50.0% #49 1,807 0 0
27 2009 59–12 83.1% #1 2,259 15 61 2011 49–24 67.1% #9 2,006 0 2
28 2010 66–13 83.5% #2 2,311 16 66 2012 48–26 64.9% #9 1,972 0 3
29 2011 61–12 83.6% #3 2,340 16 70 2013 19–22 46.3% #36 1,778 0 4
30 2012 67–11 85.9% #2 2,347 17 76 — — — — — — —
31 2013 45–17 72.6% #6 2,189 17 77 2015 3–7 30.0% #410 1,693 0 4
32 2014 68–12 85.0% #2 2,343 17 82 2016 7–10 41.2% #144 1,748 0 4
33 2015 61–11 84.7% #3 2,398 17 88 2017 5–12 29.4% #105 1,666 0 4
34 2016 21–7 75.0% #16 2,283 17 88 — — — — — — —
35 2017 53–5 91.4% #2 2,385 19 95 2019 7–11 38.9% #219 1,665 0 4
36 2018 49–10 83.1% #3 2,261 20 99 — — — — — — —
37 2019 53–11 82.8% #3 2,240 20 103 — — — — — — —
38 2020 5–1 83.3% #5 2,240 20 103 — — — — — — —
39 2021 9–5 64.3% #16 2,128 20 103 — — — — — — —