H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Roger Federer vs Jose Acasuso H2H: 5-0

Roger Federer holds a 5–0 lead over Jose Acasuso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Roger Federer leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Roger Federer won the 2009 Cincinnati Masters third round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roger Federer
SUI Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Jose Acasuso
ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 19, 2009* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Roger Federer #1 6-3 7-5 Jose Acasuso #51 Match data
May 28, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Roger Federer #2 7-6(8) 5-7 7-6(2) 6-2 Jose Acasuso #45 Match data
Apr 3, 2008* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Roger Federer #1 7-6(5) 6-2 Jose Acasuso #45 Match data
Aug 21, 2005* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Roger Federer #1 6-4 6-3 Jose Acasuso #52 Match data
Aug 27, 2003* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Roger Federer #2 5-7 6-3 6-3 2-0 (ret.) Jose Acasuso #75 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roger Federer #97 #1 12,315 2,430 1,206 267 81.9% 20 28 6 22 27 103
Jose Acasuso #1,107 #20 1,640 1,830 181 178 50.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roger Federer Jose Acasuso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–3 40.0% #301 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 12–14 46.2% #64 1,663 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 30–27 52.6% #29 1,771 0 0 2001 8–12 40.0% #86 1,537 0 0
19 2001 46–20 69.7% #13 1,874 0 1 2002 21–17 55.3% #41 1,667 0 1
20 2002 55–22 71.4% #6 1,944 0 4 2003 11–19 36.7% #101 1,613 0 1
21 2003 74–16 82.2% #2 2,104 1 11 2004 18–16 52.9% #67 1,678 0 2
22 2004 70–5 93.3% #1 2,301 4 22 2005 27–26 50.9% #40 1,724 0 2
23 2005 80–4 95.2% #1 2,348 6 33 2006 28–20 58.3% #27 1,709 0 3
24 2006 90–5 94.7% #1 2,401 9 45 2007 18–19 48.6% #65 1,685 0 3
25 2007 67–9 88.2% #1 2,330 12 53 2008 26–24 52.0% #48 1,697 0 3
26 2008 63–15 80.8% #2 2,198 13 57 2009 21–21 50.0% #51 1,731 0 3
27 2009 59–12 83.1% #1 2,259 15 61 2010 1–3 25.0% #253 1,666 0 3
28 2010 66–13 83.5% #2 2,311 16 66 2011 2–1 66.7% #255 1,656 0 3
29 2011 61–12 83.6% #3 2,340 16 70 — — — — — — —
30 2012 67–11 85.9% #2 2,347 17 76 — — — — — — —
31 2013 45–17 72.6% #6 2,189 17 77 — — — — — — —
32 2014 68–12 85.0% #2 2,343 17 82 — — — — — — —
33 2015 61–11 84.7% #3 2,398 17 88 — — — — — — —
34 2016 21–7 75.0% #16 2,283 17 88 — — — — — — —
35 2017 53–5 91.4% #2 2,385 19 95 — — — — — — —
36 2018 49–10 83.1% #3 2,261 20 99 — — — — — — —
37 2019 53–11 82.8% #3 2,240 20 103 — — — — — — —
38 2020 5–1 83.3% #5 2,240 20 103 — — — — — — —
39 2021 9–5 64.3% #16 2,128 20 103 — — — — — — —