H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Roger Federer vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 18-0
Roger Federer holds a 18–0 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 18 main-draw meetings, Roger Federer leads 9–0 on hard courts and 7–0 on grass. Most recently, Roger Federer won the 2017 US Open second round 6-1 6-7(3) 4-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
18
–
0
18 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2017* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-1 6-7(3) 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Feb 25, 2015* | Dubai | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-3 6-1 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Jun 16, 2013* | Halle | ATP 500 | F | Grass | Roger Federer | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Jul 5, 2012* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Roger Federer | 6-1 6-2 6-2 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Jun 16, 2012* | Halle | ATP 500 | SF | Grass | Roger Federer | 6-1 6-4 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Mar 2, 2012* | Dubai | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-3 6-4 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2012* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Roger Federer | (w/o) | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Roger Federer | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-3 6-3 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Jun 5, 2007* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Roger Federer | 7-6(3) 6-4 6-4 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Mar 4, 2007* | Dubai | ATP 500 | F | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-4 6-3 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2007* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-3 6-3 7-6(5) | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Mar 4, 2006* | Dubai | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-2 6-3 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2005* | Dubai | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-3 7-5 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Jun 11, 2004* | Halle | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Roger Federer | 6-2 6-1 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2003* | Halle | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Roger Federer | 4-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| May 3, 2003* | Munich | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Roger Federer | 6-2 6-3 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Jun 15, 2002* | Halle | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Roger Federer | 6-3 6-4 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Nov 23, 2000* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Roger Federer | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Federer | #97 | #1 | 12,315 | 2,430 | 1,206 | 267 | 81.9% | 20 | 28 | 6 | 22 | 27 | 103 |
| Mikhail Youzhny | #115 | #8 | 3,500 | 2,069 | 477 | 405 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roger Federer | Mikhail Youzhny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #301 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1999 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #29 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #13 | 1,874 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 55–22 | 71.4% | #6 | 1,944 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #32 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2003 | 74–16 | 82.2% | #2 | 2,104 | 1 | 11 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2004 | 70–5 | 93.3% | #1 | 2,301 | 4 | 22 | 2004 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #16 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2005 | 80–4 | 95.2% | #1 | 2,348 | 6 | 33 | 2005 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2006 | 90–5 | 94.7% | #1 | 2,401 | 9 | 45 | 2006 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #24 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2007 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #1 | 2,330 | 12 | 53 | 2007 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2008 | 63–15 | 80.8% | #2 | 2,198 | 13 | 57 | 2008 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2009 | 59–12 | 83.1% | #1 | 2,259 | 15 | 61 | 2009 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,960 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2010 | 66–13 | 83.5% | #2 | 2,311 | 16 | 66 | 2010 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2011 | 61–12 | 83.6% | #3 | 2,340 | 16 | 70 | 2011 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2012 | 67–11 | 85.9% | #2 | 2,347 | 17 | 76 | 2012 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2013 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #6 | 2,189 | 17 | 77 | 2013 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 2014 | 68–12 | 85.0% | #2 | 2,343 | 17 | 82 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #48 | 1,795 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | 2015 | 61–11 | 84.7% | #3 | 2,398 | 17 | 88 | 2015 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,701 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | 2016 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #16 | 2,283 | 17 | 88 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #57 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 |
| 35 | 2017 | 53–5 | 91.4% | #2 | 2,385 | 19 | 95 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,679 | 0 | 10 |
| 36 | 2018 | 49–10 | 83.1% | #3 | 2,261 | 20 | 99 | 2018 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #115 | 1,637 | 0 | 10 |
| 37 | 2019 | 53–11 | 82.8% | #3 | 2,240 | 20 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2020 | 5–1 | 83.3% | #5 | 2,240 | 20 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2021 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #16 | 2,128 | 20 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |