H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Roger Federer vs Nicolas Escude H2H: 2-2

Roger Federer and Nicolas Escude are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Escude leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Roger Federer leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nicolas Escude won the 2002 Rotterdam quarterfinal 3-6 7-6(8) 7-5.

SUI Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
FRA Age 50 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 23, 2002* Rotterdam ATP 250 QF Hard Nicolas Escude #22 3-6 7-6(8) 7-5 Roger Federer #13 Match data
Feb 25, 2001* Rotterdam ATP 250 F Hard Nicolas Escude #60 7-5 3-6 7-6(5) Roger Federer #23 Match data
Jan 19, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Roger Federer #29 6-1 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Escude #46 Match data
Nov 9, 2000* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Roger Federer #24 6-3 7-6(3) Nicolas Escude #38 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roger Federer #97 #1 12,315 2,430 1,206 267 81.9% 20 28 6 22 27 103
Nicolas Escude #1,071 #17 1,357 1,909 157 124 55.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roger Federer Nicolas Escude
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–3 40.0% #301 1,530 0 0
17 1999 12–14 46.2% #64 1,663 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #670 1,497 0 0
18 2000 30–27 52.6% #29 1,771 0 0
19 2001 46–20 69.7% #13 1,874 0 1 1995 1–2 33.3% #189 1,503 0 0
20 2002 55–22 71.4% #6 1,944 0 4
21 2003 74–16 82.2% #2 2,104 1 11 1997 6–6 50.0% #93 1,620 0 0
22 2004 70–5 93.3% #1 2,301 4 22 1998 22–22 50.0% #37 1,699 0 0
23 2005 80–4 95.2% #1 2,348 6 33 1999 19–15 55.9% #37 1,820 0 1
24 2006 90–5 94.7% #1 2,401 9 45 2000 26–22 54.2% #48 1,717 0 1
25 2007 67–9 88.2% #1 2,330 12 53 2001 28–23 54.9% #27 1,724 0 2
26 2008 63–15 80.8% #2 2,198 13 57 2002 29–15 65.9% #34 1,842 0 3
27 2009 59–12 83.1% #1 2,259 15 61 2003 11–10 52.4% #114 1,790 0 3
28 2010 66–13 83.5% #2 2,311 16 66 2004 15–8 65.2% #64 1,829 0 4
29 2011 61–12 83.6% #3 2,340 16 70
30 2012 67–11 85.9% #2 2,347 17 76
31 2013 45–17 72.6% #6 2,189 17 77
32 2014 68–12 85.0% #2 2,343 17 82
33 2015 61–11 84.7% #3 2,398 17 88
34 2016 21–7 75.0% #16 2,283 17 88
35 2017 53–5 91.4% #2 2,385 19 95
36 2018 49–10 83.1% #3 2,261 20 99
37 2019 53–11 82.8% #3 2,240 20 103
38 2020 5–1 83.3% #5 2,240 20 103
39 2021 9–5 64.3% #16 2,128 20 103