H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Roger Federer vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 12-3
Roger Federer holds a 12–3 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 15 main-draw meetings, Roger Federer leads 8–1 on hard courts and 3–1 on grass. Most recently, Roger Federer won the 2009 Miami Masters third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
12
–
3
15 main draw meetings
GER
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2009* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-4 6-1 | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2008* | Halle | ATP 500 | SF | Grass | Roger Federer | 6-1 6-4 | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
| Oct 27, 2007* | Basel | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-3 6-2 | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
| Oct 20, 2007* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-4 6-4 | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
| Jan 29, 2006* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | SF | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-3 5-7 6-0 6-2 | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
| Sep 7, 2005* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
| Aug 18, 2005* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Roger Federer | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
| Jun 26, 2005* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Roger Federer | 6-2 6-7(5) 6-1 7-5 | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
| Mar 13, 2005* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-4 6-1 | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
| May 28, 2004* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Roger Federer | 6-3 6-4 7-6(6) | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
| Jun 15, 2003* | Halle | ATP 250 | F | Grass | Roger Federer | 6-1 6-3 | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
| Jun 15, 2002* | Halle | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Nicolas Kiefer | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Roger Federer | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2001* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Nicolas Kiefer | 6-3 1-6 7-6(4) | Roger Federer | Match data |
| Mar 14, 2001* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Nicolas Kiefer | 3-6 7-5 6-1 | Roger Federer | Match data |
| Feb 24, 2000* | London | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-2 6-3 | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Federer | #97 | #1 | 12,315 | 2,430 | 1,206 | 267 | 81.9% | 20 | 28 | 6 | 22 | 27 | 103 |
| Nicolas Kiefer | #720 | #4 | 2,447 | 1,984 | 343 | 252 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roger Federer | Nicolas Kiefer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #301 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #29 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #13 | 1,874 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2002 | 55–22 | 71.4% | #6 | 1,944 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2003 | 74–16 | 82.2% | #2 | 2,104 | 1 | 11 | 1999 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,921 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2004 | 70–5 | 93.3% | #1 | 2,301 | 4 | 22 | 2000 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,921 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2005 | 80–4 | 95.2% | #1 | 2,348 | 6 | 33 | 2001 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2006 | 90–5 | 94.7% | #1 | 2,401 | 9 | 45 | 2002 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #72 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2007 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #1 | 2,330 | 12 | 53 | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2008 | 63–15 | 80.8% | #2 | 2,198 | 13 | 57 | 2004 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #21 | 1,897 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2009 | 59–12 | 83.1% | #1 | 2,259 | 15 | 61 | 2005 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #22 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2010 | 66–13 | 83.5% | #2 | 2,311 | 16 | 66 | 2006 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #48 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2011 | 61–12 | 83.6% | #3 | 2,340 | 16 | 70 | 2007 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #49 | 1,893 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2012 | 67–11 | 85.9% | #2 | 2,347 | 17 | 76 | 2008 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #38 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2013 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #6 | 2,189 | 17 | 77 | 2009 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #116 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2014 | 68–12 | 85.0% | #2 | 2,343 | 17 | 82 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #722 | 1,717 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2015 | 61–11 | 84.7% | #3 | 2,398 | 17 | 88 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #16 | 2,283 | 17 | 88 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 53–5 | 91.4% | #2 | 2,385 | 19 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 49–10 | 83.1% | #3 | 2,261 | 20 | 99 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 53–11 | 82.8% | #3 | 2,240 | 20 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2020 | 5–1 | 83.3% | #5 | 2,240 | 20 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2021 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #16 | 2,128 | 20 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |