H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Roger Federer vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 4-0

Roger Federer holds a 4–0 lead over Nicolas Lapentti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Roger Federer leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roger Federer won the 2010 Miami Masters second round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roger Federer
SUI Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Nicolas Lapentti
ECU Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 27, 2010* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Roger Federer #1 6-3 6-3 Nicolas Lapentti #102 Match data
May 13, 2004* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Roger Federer #1 6-3 6-3 Nicolas Lapentti #67 Match data
Oct 19, 2002* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Roger Federer #7 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Lapentti #30 Match data
May 15, 2002* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Roger Federer #14 6-1 6-4 Nicolas Lapentti #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roger Federer #97 #1 12,315 2,430 1,206 267 81.9% 20 28 6 22 27 103
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,935 282 280 50.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roger Federer Nicolas Lapentti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–3 40.0% #301 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 12–14 46.2% #64 1,663 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 30–27 52.6% #29 1,771 0 0 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1
19 2001 46–20 69.7% #13 1,874 0 1 1996 11–19 36.7% #121 1,576 0 1
20 2002 55–22 71.4% #6 1,944 0 4 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,660 0 1
21 2003 74–16 82.2% #2 2,104 1 11 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,596 0 1
22 2004 70–5 93.3% #1 2,301 4 22 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3
23 2005 80–4 95.2% #1 2,348 6 33 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,755 0 3
24 2006 90–5 94.7% #1 2,401 9 45 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,837 0 4
25 2007 67–9 88.2% #1 2,330 12 53 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,714 0 5
26 2008 63–15 80.8% #2 2,198 13 57 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,697 0 5
27 2009 59–12 83.1% #1 2,259 15 61 2004 7–14 33.3% #122 1,600 0 5
28 2010 66–13 83.5% #2 2,311 16 66 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,579 0 5
29 2011 61–12 83.6% #3 2,340 16 70 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,682 0 5
30 2012 67–11 85.9% #2 2,347 17 76 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,611 0 5
31 2013 45–17 72.6% #6 2,189 17 77 2008 14–17 45.2% #86 1,658 0 5
32 2014 68–12 85.0% #2 2,343 17 82 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,668 0 5
33 2015 61–11 84.7% #3 2,398 17 88 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,582 0 5
34 2016 21–7 75.0% #16 2,283 17 88 — — — — — — —
35 2017 53–5 91.4% #2 2,385 19 95 — — — — — — —
36 2018 49–10 83.1% #3 2,261 20 99 — — — — — — —
37 2019 53–11 82.8% #3 2,240 20 103 — — — — — — —
38 2020 5–1 83.3% #5 2,240 20 103 — — — — — — —
39 2021 9–5 64.3% #16 2,128 20 103 — — — — — — —