H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Roger Federer vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 13-2
Roger Federer holds a 13–2 lead over Radek Stepanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 15 main-draw meetings, Roger Federer leads 8–0 on hard courts and 5–2 on clay. Most recently, Roger Federer won the 2014 Monte Carlo Masters third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
13
–
2
15 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2014* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Roger Federer | 6-1 6-2 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Feb 27, 2014* | Dubai | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-2 6-7(4) 6-3 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| May 8, 2013* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Roger Federer | 6-3 6-3 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Mar 26, 2011* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-3 6-3 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Nov 12, 2010* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-4 6-3 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Nov 6, 2010* | Basel | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-3 6-2 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| May 1, 2009* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Roger Federer | 6-4 6-1 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Nov 9, 2008 | Masters Cup | ATP Finals | RR | Hard | Roger Federer | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Oct 15, 2008* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-3 7-6(6) | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2008* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-3 6-3 6-2 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| May 10, 2008* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Radek Stepanek | 7-6(4) 7-6(7) | Roger Federer | Match data |
| Aug 11, 2007* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Roger Federer | 7-6(6) 6-2 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| May 13, 2006* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Roger Federer | 6-1 6-4 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Jul 10, 2004* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Roger Federer | 6-1 5-7 6-4 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Jul 12, 2002* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Radek Stepanek | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Roger Federer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Federer | #97 | #1 | 12,315 | 2,430 | 1,206 | 267 | 81.9% | 20 | 28 | 6 | 22 | 27 | 103 |
| Radek Stepanek | #492 | #8 | 2,700 | 2,034 | 366 | 283 | 56.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roger Federer | Radek Stepanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #301 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1999 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #29 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #13 | 1,874 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 55–22 | 71.4% | #6 | 1,944 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 74–16 | 82.2% | #2 | 2,104 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 70–5 | 93.3% | #1 | 2,301 | 4 | 22 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #542 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 80–4 | 95.2% | #1 | 2,348 | 6 | 33 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 90–5 | 94.7% | #1 | 2,401 | 9 | 45 | 2003 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #46 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #1 | 2,330 | 12 | 53 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 63–15 | 80.8% | #2 | 2,198 | 13 | 57 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 59–12 | 83.1% | #1 | 2,259 | 15 | 61 | 2006 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 66–13 | 83.5% | #2 | 2,311 | 16 | 66 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2011 | 61–12 | 83.6% | #3 | 2,340 | 16 | 70 | 2008 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2012 | 67–11 | 85.9% | #2 | 2,347 | 17 | 76 | 2009 | 44–19 | 69.8% | #12 | 2,010 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2013 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #6 | 2,189 | 17 | 77 | 2010 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2014 | 68–12 | 85.0% | #2 | 2,343 | 17 | 82 | 2011 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,880 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2015 | 61–11 | 84.7% | #3 | 2,398 | 17 | 88 | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 2016 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #16 | 2,283 | 17 | 88 | 2013 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #44 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2017 | 53–5 | 91.4% | #2 | 2,385 | 19 | 95 | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #68 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | 2018 | 49–10 | 83.1% | #3 | 2,261 | 20 | 99 | 2015 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #197 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 37 | 2019 | 53–11 | 82.8% | #3 | 2,240 | 20 | 103 | 2016 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #107 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 |
| 38 | 2020 | 5–1 | 83.3% | #5 | 2,240 | 20 | 103 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #354 | 1,900 | 0 | 5 |
| 39 | 2021 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #16 | 2,128 | 20 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |